From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Easy way to make Emacs look more "modern" Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 01:03:42 +0300 Message-ID: References: <178b9fb6-0f1d-3f61-9397-1c376255db62@grinta.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20583"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 To: Daniele Nicolodi , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 10 00:04:44 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJCG-0005DY-Lj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 00:04:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJCF-0008OB-CL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 18:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJBM-0007PO-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 18:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:36470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJBK-0007Fo-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 18:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id u3so17815109wrg.3 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 15:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5b1YxafHwwVIaoY792lc3NNLC3ae+Xs7FFY5mYtiofM=; b=E1X0E0oqoPCzpBMoLCuI80tRuflNjgmVPXTaEVOOAHmiuN14/aeRXoYUbbEaxmKvXY u0/F9/TfkHFxeJQ9UchbcR2Vcbg+u4NK7PA3EB2Pk6OPOVnVpm2+5dscf+yTjSJFmjC1 Pdv9D0KI8jiEmaQ5v5N5/L7Ou4CIjv9mJD2eisCIEdWVsparIQLHk/rTVuE2SQte31C3 jN/Mf/KLbRzYJf6IqxkTJLbAnCy9LavBn1j02Oa9HrEPr3MA/dB/TprZHAInZ14i2KlK ddx0HwRXzZoTazkyrYYxsaJvA8WA6jn92qC7UrIH4AYReMVStB8SMtd1wOI4ijtCduH+ yeeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5b1YxafHwwVIaoY792lc3NNLC3ae+Xs7FFY5mYtiofM=; b=PCxjnL25h+Lul7COdOwPyUA7+hepEAXfvABehXJ2f4cF68JkbZmNERuelvyI+xkUrb ETDnS4iBjv67Se6taGJwEWm5DnoWMrqsG1K4bfmg4HdhRrfFkvEB15zgIsVi1XewJREp 7jofeK/4dWv3SHq3xFOY3G9Mysgse1p1akOgdQBm5lt4Vu91S2I15NSqC7oPf7s/gcjH 9nt/tcTEP0Y3BZJt2qxqLHZeKUFyEeeINgSUyiyZ86QyHgLu7s4ktvNcWQqFzRx73X3t a1YCiT0ZNQajbxhH2o7cFEcb3ff0b3xQsxpuXRka1EZNZ5braP2Bhm3KecRH1G/uLH++ fbgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gvs/yOPvJLgazPXDyt1DEYiTKM5zshPDl+5/aekXds7Yu27QK WuCYjMRD1oyE3LPpYAmFjeUl/EXP/KA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzaLQJsa7bpn5vD74p1h1Gb6zxPEflKFRNJhkj+PNK65Ymurwt5zLFVZTqr4f+6y90zbGXCw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:edcd:0:b0:207:9b2b:89fa with SMTP id v13-20020adfedcd000000b002079b2b89famr5559473wro.109.1649541824609; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 15:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n15-20020a05600c500f00b0038cfb1a43d6sm13725031wmr.24.2022.04.09.15.03.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Apr 2022 15:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <178b9fb6-0f1d-3f61-9397-1c376255db62@grinta.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288067 Archived-At: On 10.04.2022 00:54, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > How do you define contrast? Roughly speaking, it's the "distance" between the foreground and the background colors. > I am proposing to change only the box color: > the active box color to a lighter shade and the inactive one to a > lighter shade. I think the contrast overall is unchanged. But I admit > that I haven't mathematically computer it. Of course, your suggestion is fairly orthogonal and can (and should) be reviewed on its own. I just chimed with an additional suggestion in because it reminded be of an old peeve of mine.