From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: LanX Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: In emacs 23 compile-mode doesn't recognize (c)perl error messages Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:06:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <6d2cb724-900e-4e8a-9145-8b271037c8e2@z24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <716a18f5-d4e2-4472-b7b0-ecd5cbedac5a@j39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <84db9f9d-c358-4e3d-ba1e-3b7e6cb764dc@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <478c9e51-d767-4567-ad01-9736599d1b61@g19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cb1c6ca93f047581160e X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255097405 31000 80.91.229.12 (9 Oct 2009 14:10:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 09 16:09:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MwGA7-00065Z-Jt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:09:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwGA7-0004SM-0H for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MwG7H-000273-C7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:06:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MwG7C-00024s-Px for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:06:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35641 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwG7C-00024n-JD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:06:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-px0-f202.google.com ([209.85.216.202]:54291) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MwG7C-0007Rw-3i for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:06:38 -0400 Original-Received: by pxi40 with SMTP id 40so7313771pxi.24 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:06:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Hyy673+VW+rZE4Ul7Tz0JoAOBmHHYyLp1Sia6rmqmdg=; b=d7nJ1daJVqNNKsQPoL8aNQmJbt9CHILEfG/7dVOtkCquhIEZW41CWWV9LNXWP/1/p0 z8/PW6F4NLxvoP7Swp/D7OydA+flbSynlMxKvZb7DtveuH6/9S9xb3FxeZCOfwdxxkVk xM/xTXjuc/Ui+Mhlvg8HQ5hShvx5iRMKdFqfo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iiJpeyB7nnA9Kcvmjc/ZhDq1ivJudFwqvnmyXQRw1/ZGuE5wVHjLzicBIGCUCNoqmh fBQ0d2El+yzXR5C1f/dF0aFGslPKJRFBlwcd4xRd87Zn/v47SOBcpDk/mOOZqCajYsmM JBy2bAOAI/fUv5C/u5ieNSRQPy+uQBqBsIBhg= Original-Received: by 10.143.21.37 with SMTP id y37mr209172wfi.215.1255097194293; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:06:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:68794 Archived-At: --00504502cb1c6ca93f047581160e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Here my ticket 4689: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4689 Emacs Bug Tracking System I wonder if the change in unicode support in emacs 23 broke the way regexes work in a subtle way...or if ubuntu somehow mixed up the unicode settings ??? --00504502cb1c6ca93f047581160e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Here my ticket

4689: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4689
Emacs Bug Tracking System

I wonder if the change in unicode support in emacs 23 broke the way regexes work in a subtle way...or if ubuntu somehow mixed up the unicode settings ???
--00504502cb1c6ca93f047581160e--