From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "David House" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080829153958.GB1053@muc.de> <001501c909f4$c40175b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <48B89553.6050205@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220061523 15730 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2008 01:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Kyllingstad?= , Drew Adams To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 03:59:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZFkW-0008DL-0B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:59:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZFjW-0001XI-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZFjR-0001WT-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZFjP-0001UO-US for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:58:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46990 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZFjP-0001UG-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.153]:55607) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZFjP-00020L-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so610723yxf.66 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kI2Co/z67lotI+cjHk86AucnKqm2nDLH4SdbgLD7ZDc=; b=Z0q19Sqt71WfaXkKyiOtN37cvYHftO1TwQhd6nW0U6KIfU3SJw74Vjfy3eKWywUusE /Mj21SU4kT6IE3xf4+IVCYsgTTArx8U7QZ+XBuFtm7G78/BjM2YmpPuHifjamoZAo/9D eQ26KTx1WFOnEg1cvix2HFhosFns3vKfgJZWk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=cgEkskT1RsLoLOicLTCQKSrwz1TGVrHAqgDjq7XwJGRVYINf5BE+Z+HWji5mNhghaH n1KelPEIclNYiSjAuiUs2VbkOl14/udXpnNuYYJZ7SVYe08t6/SmJvi/FegW0ZayZhID saYngT6ehR3mwan4vWsRlp3deYVeoK+b75EG8= Original-Received: by 10.151.49.8 with SMTP id b8mr5172851ybk.127.1220061506656; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.192.3 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48B89553.6050205@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103237 Archived-At: 2008/8/30 Lennart Borgman (gmail) : > Didn't I mention that I think it is a quite nice suggestion? Yes, but it got buried under 50 further emails discussing a different option. I thought I'd make an attempt to revive it. > (But I can't see that there is any need to mention where the trash can > is as suggested above.) I have no real preference as to whether we show the location or not. -- -David