From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "David House" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:29:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080829153958.GB1053@muc.de> <001501c909f4$c40175b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220056163 3719 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2008 00:29:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, Drew Adams To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Kyllingstad?=" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 02:30:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZELw-0004tc-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:30:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEKx-0004Qo-JN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEKt-0004Q9-Bp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEKs-0004Pc-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49999 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEKs-0004PY-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.154]:39283) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZEKr-0005qp-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:29:01 -0400 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so602613yxf.66 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:29:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=N0Tnt2k7llHJt+Sjr5IjshPXAg2CJYA59FTX4TaOVRs=; b=xw9VaHfORP1NESA9jppR1d3jsSwmcQJRvXtxAIsF7Irs4Q3N8xFdkWF2TPVY7ot7xm iw04i2QG9Cdk1pMaRRKvwau9A0dzvE6ypFJosl/Q3j8uH+FOQkPdRM+Og/j7gWM6zjm+ FOQ/V8Liwm5/0QBeQeQBcjYmFnoI8RDrGkdEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=phyhp1qzYHH7GkBKOluGHOVQZ4tvGQkW/hJPNdFQtZ1rYIo0ZcyoalHQ7xSGNbu9ip 2svbhpd5DlSQJVwe+vI/bHg4fWy6MF0RasvTok0ly3WOYKUWQlCJU9miIGHdRxrlTjSV nrOzGkw/s+T0tduOe3HDyaxpE2jvPldsvm+a8= Original-Received: by 10.151.111.15 with SMTP id o15mr5138803ybm.7.1220056140460; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.192.3 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:29:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103234 Archived-At: 2008/8/29 Ren=E9 Kyllingstad : >> I still feel the best default is to send the file to trash without >> asking any questions, then inform the user that this has happened. >> (E.g. (message "File sent to trash folder %s" path-to-trash).) This > > And mentions: " to undo". It doesn't get in your way= , > but in case it was a quick mistake you immediately see how to fix it (thi= s > is how gmail handles similar actions, and it's just brilliant). Does anyone else have any feelings on this? This seems like a really nice way to implement things, but this subthread seems to have been lost in the flow. --=20 -David