From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags-regen-mode: handling extensionless files Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:00:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87tteaznog.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <8734lrrj4e.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40237"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 23 19:01:12 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ssmQx-000AEW-ST for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:01:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssmQI-0005X2-4x; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssmQE-0005JC-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from forward501a.mail.yandex.net ([178.154.239.81]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssmQ9-0004h3-6Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-33.iva.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-33.iva.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:3dad:0:640:7b05:0]) by forward501a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPS id A9CB6616FC; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:00:10 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-33.iva.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 80WIxwPOnuQ0-x15q5VHm; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:00:09 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1727110810; bh=OuGEJfOML0ljTu33zE+wjGkezezEV0HclyGMRmwQhSQ=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Cc:References:Date:To; b=Hgakj0vngyuLd8e081co3r85PncNo6VX7OEWXNtXCk4PHdu8DW/dhECgqJ0qv2X1R fPa5JQzxIaBHveJbtGKIKvw1tm51aAgMzcWpwvCpD8YmgaKUovrhNpnXgL00eJDZM9 NkFznNF2P59asnfDsb3VIXhpiKmwlQRboUrxS+uA= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-33.iva.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Original-Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2B71200043; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:00:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:00:07 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelledguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthejredttddv jeenucfhrhhomhepffhmihhtrhihucfiuhhtohhvuceoughguhhtohhvseihrghnuggvgi drrhhuqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeihfejueevteffffdvfeetffffkefhuedujeei heehiedulefghefgffefudffudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegughhuthhovhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqudeffeefleelheehvddqvdelgeejjeejjeeiqdgughhuthhovheppeihrghnug gvgidrrhhusehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddpmhhouggv pehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonh drnhgrmhgvpdhrtghpthhtohepvghmrggtshdquggvvhgvlhesghhnuhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ib1d9465d:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:00:06 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <8734lrrj4e.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.154.239.81; envelope-from=dgutov@yandex.ru; helo=forward501a.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323980 Archived-At: On 22/09/2024 15:02, Sean Whitton wrote: >> But see my other email regarding etags' hashbang detection. > > Hashbang detection would solve my problem elegantly. > > Is my reading of the other thread correct that if we can fix the fortran > fallback then we can enable the hashbang detection? Yep, I think so. We would probably also discuss etags' auto-detection and its list of default extensions, during the next release's development.