From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing prog-indentation-context Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 01:55:59 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20160322022539.16038.77264@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <221845e0-b194-433e-bfbc-105272ae5752@default> <87twjyp21k.fsf@gmail.com> <56F242E0.7060004@online.de> <877fgtpfrw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F293E7.2000703@online.de> <87a8lpnusg.fsf@gmail.com> <83r3f12oo5.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2D156.9040401@online.de> <83k2kt2i51.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2E643.4060903@online.de> <592bbafa-76ae-49d9-b5cd-644b3619a0d8@default> <87poukn8pl.fsf@gmail.com> <837fgs35q3.fsf@gnu.org> <8337rf3m4u.fsf@gnu.org> <877fgqef3r.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459205782 13246 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2016 22:56:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:56:22 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 00:56:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1akg56-0001r9-Fu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:56:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akg55-0002uZ-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:56:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akg4r-0002uT-Hu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akg4o-0002mp-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]:37481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akg4o-0002mf-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p65so1790314wmp.0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GGQJWRNSJ2A0qdi8/m0SkYvFsPq9+L0pxOWdv16zqG8=; b=FLgC35HJ7iewVMkQMTDM9XxTzWiJUFv5KuGTBH7jyWu4KjUKuJSXqE74APN7Igt4QG HQBr+Brsv+u/jNMo/214PH2S13j0i8SFnrI9JURhNOmFwxAVWrgvPeiLCtCHK6pqfydJ q4snlk0D2m5vx4MGJYpegdxfeh/FmvU5v1akC3U3gpPTE5z8ZMQoHT/FsgCBzOeAlE9o t5tYXtrhTUmGFjREDLkyZjSidi10O6KnnHXZJw8cCV87uystw5fkG93tmk/Jnbglm3EI rBjIaVu808daokHpZXn0biTAT1bE1tpmZAJ51APCOmAr7hJx3vS4OO8rGKVXv77MNZnI 91VA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GGQJWRNSJ2A0qdi8/m0SkYvFsPq9+L0pxOWdv16zqG8=; b=LBco/5IBK9+DGGAQs+r2uoY260A6wpR5jnILXbiqHdrBjnHQ+b0PqE95ce/vW1v1Nh uGoK0NHXUj9qNQajaCE9OJO+JNeJ85JymZuQBMoGVySu/QrtmLKrnOM6hJLDsyziz6UZ hbQeAMsILLP4c+Y5Haajcujwj0eA1Vqqfe/OGmN76tQNkFCvZnpYFzt50UbTlApduZqZ VxpNoLPjqoNFYX2gCuEQV1CYgn1wz0NVSUUHAGgpVb9su/N+rvYRBXG4qE0enigE3hHo eaHpSpwITCDNlwcGnC4xzysPlqMkAI14CKTb44H1sQeUxEPngzwe+Cw4iUmSBHgIg8AV /jDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIsrN2dBZ0EgjZaUKWVkTTL+I4Wmlop0xxe10xWhvE9u7bXY6A2/+eWjHaSNCUsuA== X-Received: by 10.194.104.202 with SMTP id gg10mr11818684wjb.103.1459205761290; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w184sm12011903wmb.1.2016.03.28.15.55.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:56:00 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202369 Archived-At: On 03/29/2016 01:08 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> In that case, we'd be saddled with (font-lock|syntax-ppss)-dont-widen, but > > We really should fix this. `font-lock-dont-widen' is fundamentally > broken (it's usually the major mode which tells font-lock not to widen > because the major mode has narrowed in a special way, but then the user > can re-narrow on top of that and this narrowing *should* be lifted > during font-lock, but font-lock-dont-widen prevents it). Wouldn't it also be fixed if font-lock and syntax-ppss used prog-widen instead of widen?