From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33442: 26.1.90; Cairo side-by-side windows scrolling fix should be cherry-picked Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:59:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h8gc412q.fsf@gmail.com> <83wop7ivw2.fsf@gnu.org> <83in0riscq.fsf@gnu.org> <87va4qaorj.fsf@gmail.com> <1bf2b358-3ac2-46bb-f298-5c115149dea0@yandex.ru> <875zwpligs.fsf@gmail.com> <6976af8a-8fbf-da98-d770-55224a7736af@yandex.ru> <871s7dl2xg.fsf@gmail.com> <08133af3-3f70-1634-e162-ae6cfe26767f@yandex.ru> <83k1l5go6l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543499970 12920 195.159.176.226 (29 Nov 2018 13:59:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:59:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 Cc: ari.roponen@gmail.com, 33442@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 29 14:59:26 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMqk-0003G0-2H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:59:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMsq-00023s-GO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMsS-0001xy-HA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMsI-0003td-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMsI-0003tT-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMsI-0001Pe-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33442 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33442-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33442.15435000125351 (code B ref 33442); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33442) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2018 14:00:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMrT-0001OF-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:00:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:40122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMrR-0001N1-2w for 33442@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id p4so2004052wrt.7 for <33442@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 06:00:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iorUUiASMwRqDURzABskhF2vLLsPFuu9vY8Y6HaM65Q=; b=MFho2GJdLIKkDfM+8TnCmylDgec5FOMhZCgHAiAmIdnWB19LkAnQTo5sfhkqrzWZBQ OoUlQ8UAEzlBb+/dHIFSxmRrFXxoMp/UoEtJLT4rlava+FwhtSwAPnroTfUVdK2/OK/K PSMQzghjGTGY2ZWUAondYUsnV8ga4frS1bBaphO4867z8iumFyPI7K16fA29dXyjc7G4 nYxIX5OriXU07GICjtRtCVR0qdEOCzT2HJGC+4I/QoJOP1geTBo4iEdMJj/bV/8DiAFf q1m/yMPvbbNtR8Q4ElAQ5MCHFAjMEgob6RbMjkwFjIFMEUPtjmkkJl0U664WyNs7A5g4 bwBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iorUUiASMwRqDURzABskhF2vLLsPFuu9vY8Y6HaM65Q=; b=CgHs+cXWL1D3/df9sA8cZKEGeMT3v1RFCCiCwnVFtSaBtIwNQgpiazJWPIEIJLigGn 5X5O1hmQ3DrAqzcqKfJjYQYUS2AVueBMonOcnasc7QwGvMogTSNzhbK+2uDk5zNda6Dh FP3zkIXweJYzZCMDYlrhHeAJwK1mhSdxeuJ5rv/ZClRZhAm9nSd5Awws8HFapPQFYlpK AWvVz4sQrhwmBY8HINjZuGKc9X98zXQvQJtIH6p2nml1Ukvh7tl95OrbTDROOkm0b9E5 4CAU6JuCHIOmRKaZ9KiL7EmHAw0HHDAh6J+dgF8ZQztrW1PEcbjpULv9PVWGu4jq/Lll qR1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbFbJtuJn4BpCx3OrUnIP194CiKRg5lpupdL4NGmO/RFtQFIwF5 g6wX+EXuGUuQyvhB489bvxNmpmLp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VNG1LHKyG+6lHoQx4ztwR2uD3JQmtIUOANLKCBTVmMfuiKVUKbWnVk3D05tb5lQB/fbk0RKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:418b:: with SMTP id m11mr1408512wrp.8.1543500002344; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 06:00:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm2742866wrq.55.2018.11.29.06.00.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 06:00:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152892 Archived-At: On 22.11.2018 17:22, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 22.11.2018 16:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> How many users will agree to demote the DPI just to have the Cairo >> build working?  IOW, is the above a viable solution, or is it >> something many users will regard as unacceptable? > > I think so. <...> In any case, HiDPI users are still the minority, and the commit requested to be backported is a localized fix for an obvious, easy-to-reproduce regression (scrolling is indeed broken, I tested with and without the patch). So I highly suggest we allow it.