From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48471: 28.0.50; Incorrect handling of `project-ignores' on macOS (BSD find?) if project root is a directory name Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 01:29:37 +0300 Message-ID: References: <7f9e984c-bea9-f55f-526a-680a9bb3f66b@yandex.ru> <53E1AC7F-1D49-4845-8DF6-4CB24BC15E6A@gmail.com> <92AAB1AE-0D8C-4C2B-99E9-E790F4BE5330@gmail.com> <79c2002a-e404-3837-f2d8-c760ed48cdc0@yandex.ru> <3B1E8678-E36E-4A30-A067-D9A5C3E7711A@gmail.com> <7ea80286-b72c-7318-4b68-f10f62007907@yandex.ru> <83r1ho4tr7.fsf@gnu.org> <4de8fa95-e8f3-d07f-2f0c-8b06feff7190@cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 48471@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: Paul Eggert , Eli Zaretskii , Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 10 00:30:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKr8-0005we-HA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:30:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKr7-0001TK-5Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:30:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKqx-0001T1-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKqx-0000sB-BK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKqx-0000Dg-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 22:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48471 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48471-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48471.1633818587797 (code B ref 48471); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 22:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48471) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2021 22:29:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKqh-0000Cm-0z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:29:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com ([209.85.167.49]:41926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZKqf-0000CZ-NC for 48471@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 18:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id j5so55267376lfg.8 for <48471@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 15:29:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SN3XjBMdCTSv8Efgd9aAL8lMSFvOWI4Ng6YJtwMNkIM=; b=BkN6ubGzw1J6ZG2SfRQ+1oEgNgdVIVJa86AeslCUcscvv/7edn54Yi0VD6qZ5539gE G/Mw3ApR1d6DTq7j2yUGZ9/M1mKTQbgq509+cXI3ZkYnWYoa+XwE/UhSEdpcesKXFHAl 7plJi0/rZaCv5Uocg/BagIks3thQpAE1Cdd1NgtRE/s1RFo7+sLaC4Lk1lw2lbgDm1hz mDd973zei82Z7bl46wu6evkYT79OTmMGZyCrj2U0B9JkC39TME8ipuvyYNojPZTTs3jD +DoQR4TmkjgCgfKW9jw5uBYkKGesgo6R5HSbOKtXzuMU/CmuWQAD8/E3AwhZM2QFtoHV BiXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SN3XjBMdCTSv8Efgd9aAL8lMSFvOWI4Ng6YJtwMNkIM=; b=UXPgRCBEUqjlMy/dBWrPURRrGo0h1OpLrTsGEavCK9gLZSoppuHAbFTDsApPCChvnv vVRhfP7CCZ9nS08CcyB5OwieYV53BKzSD/hdZ791QugYTZB9wHoCXAJRrpNXedvktVq8 Pq6gw4apP2pqOFpJ2nOwkO4RWyQ9fyYZYM4jjmQJXC4/ZrCLomqrltz7R8Az88xfh7OB Pmgyj/csIDXmnvY3Ha1ABrC+lQad2v82UhL3PSihe/dBrh5PqJCUuCC7dsDEV4MVr6WM 7t0vIvoJEqzTUAE0OrieiRcgiMWNQk8DR2/CZmOMAgdf7cCZOTTZ26u7aCHpAK9RL4zU DWpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531TX3f3n4T27mks5InrZ3U1+aUdMmzlK6Bbl74czVtaz4zcImgn nHL78sOxXc/p0ZDO7amzB98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfzFmEKhvzpW2qECEfQXhZMtqh9MeFUsS2oIlL4pSut7Jh8G/kIyyRUMUx90KfP5TDWxn+qg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f0e:: with SMTP id y14mr18885145lfa.5.1633818579611; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 15:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([5.18.248.29]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v78sm307207lfa.144.2021.10.09.15.29.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 15:29:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4de8fa95-e8f3-d07f-2f0c-8b06feff7190@cs.ucla.edu> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216796 Archived-At: On 10.10.2021 01:07, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 10/9/21 2:53 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: >> Any chance we could say the same about '-printf'? > > Unfortunately not. find -printf is not standardized by POSIX and is > missing on (for example) Solaris 10. I see, thank you. > Perhaps you could do a quick test of whether 'find -printf' works, and > use -printf only if it works. Yeah, that's an option. But a meaningful test whether 'find' works seems a bit less obvious to design than the existing tests in grep.el I could otherwise adapt. Something to consider for future developments in Emacs 29 anyway.