From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <<878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net>> <<83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus>> <<83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus>> <<838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net>> <<20190517055202.ted62gt6hqcip7xt@Ergus>> <<83mujlbgjh.fsf@gnu.org>> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="169394"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: Eli Zaretskii , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 17:04:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRePC-000hwB-96 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 17:04:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49903 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRePB-0005n6-7w for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hReOJ-0005YU-Bz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hReOI-0001OC-C3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:33030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hReO5-0001AA-1q; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4HEs7WY102561; Fri, 17 May 2019 15:03:07 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=/D5GB9FdtMKZBoiEczCEmzK9f47L4U3NCephPh9N7xg=; b=T1tjd9m3twTWpXdbpy884TND94Ytte2+R1bHcOi5QyQd8ggc7OTDudZfErvPRCoxace4 CQnJT4Ouw4mlo4Cn3DuBHdHN7sj17z8v6lvQvDgRCW1ouDsj/ZJWeX/2iq2h+Frqz5VE rN1DM1EaUkl2mBkZTXqDYKjSH+PiUKWTyGqshh7KVZcQzSun/+pb3D3qGb9d6fo9azqF wRhqxBOONUTXpZqgboSHMZE6DSc5IalX0ZAAbAIIyHaHytRGuvxEHPNbu1a4J+avAafa L8B114nYdU5eYEsdO8+zOR942A8cXRx065v/8g8GKWwLCbJcopsQErxv/P89pQlItS+x lA== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2sdq1r2708-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 May 2019 15:03:07 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4HF1PA1018576; Fri, 17 May 2019 15:03:06 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2sggeubgb4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 May 2019 15:03:06 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x4HF35kL024260; Fri, 17 May 2019 15:03:05 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83mujlbgjh.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4849.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9259 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=788 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905170092 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9259 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=840 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905170092 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.85 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120491 Archived-At: > > 1) vim is there in all the GNU/Linux distros. >=20 > Not much we can do about that. Feel free to lobby distros to include > Emacs. IMO, if something is related to 40-year old decision, it is > this one. Yes. Unix distributions did usually include both vi and Emacs. Why wouldn't GNU/Linux distributions include both?