From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should fixes for Bug#23936 go also to emacs-25? Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:12:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469096247 23914 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2016 10:17:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:17:27 +0000 (UTC) To: Tino Calancha , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 12:17:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bQB2c-0001TZ-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:17:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQB2b-0000XC-Vn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:17:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQAyW-0005Wy-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQAyO-0006xR-8m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQAyO-0006wq-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C5A161197; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id a2GMtipFTF9M; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6185F1611D9; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:12:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pB5U5_40Z1bQ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.52] (AMontpellier-656-1-291-239.w90-0.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.0.119.239]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08A00161197; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:12:50 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205937 Archived-At: On 07/21/2016 11:04 AM, Tino Calancha wrote: > What branches should get the fix? If it's purely fixes for documentation that describes emacs-25 behavior, it should go into emacs-25. That being said, we don't want to add major new constraints to the Emacs 25 documentation, so that we can preserve wiggle room for later releases.