From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Urban Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35885: 25.2; Few mistakes in Emacs Manual (+ proposals) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 02:01:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83ft8qn0mz.fsf@gnu.org> <834kp6my0u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21518"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 Cc: 35885@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 14 02:02:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAm-0005VV-4x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 02:02:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAk-0001MP-JH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAZ-0001L0-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAY-0004W2-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAY-0005Mo-9M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Urban Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35885 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35885-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35885.159736330320604 (code B ref 35885); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2020 00:01:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51414 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAF-0005MG-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com ([209.85.208.173]:39872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6NAC-0005M2-S4 for 35885@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 20:01:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id v9so8102941ljk.6 for <35885@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 17:01:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mAGZ6D7sPP2FEhUtfGYSZB1R0GuaGaurppTyojN5s9Q=; b=bTRtg/N9Jb6mMtObyxQH2kvivG4C3PcvDYxLWX25sPpHfzZVUOePbdg9JZcYHKZTk1 c48RGJLgfxrQwGFMsxvANd17tkLdNXqiQ5gIM4NRlVyA37Ot0B9EY4ZqjZGHy7M0CqfN lsQNRPi/p/YMHPsoaxttqPhR8nHNlP6WnUNhjt0KBP/0sM3XAAWD9T+ckCHKADnahq7+ OPuiajqATG1XefKEicHL6ix7MuUAqAy9TtOQysGrZJqlHCXIva0TiGTn20affMNJhrqr Ie2S6CCchatAVNDSLNHevf1kF2Ozhn3xkf0/X+wtXRoTdBge8LG92iYpcxJ89nJiqxfe SJ1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mAGZ6D7sPP2FEhUtfGYSZB1R0GuaGaurppTyojN5s9Q=; b=OhS0oBuocKe56IQy96xlw2PGJILVpS4mq0DjfsrvBEwR+F84M/QxuaH4HGR5CPEOan CaeauEk5VuosN3+APrn8jOHkV+Ar0vPY1y6YQRzGatlOExMjAJ4IqofuAvjngo39LhfW 03FOnRdUYAx2+Ve6nrobH4jihB6cpASGCBGF4WN6t1ZS554buvnmnBlPnP+Jk3SwxDmB ruVYBrHoZcGEnrR+Vm4Qqg3c0BIe+lL+NHx1sMw5dcwo/umh31hHIMD58Gr3yiQAHhCC ZC14AbzdGe839GkS9/OzWXerj2gdBA7swZjtjyOXCTl6kG5xf9tOHVqX+Ccy2inVADxp /wbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JNGJKaP6A863wSgwXOZJt+Q1za5zENCKoN3d/j2KwbfMLQFya lUQJJiRe9MDOj9BN92TiV3c61RYb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5LoLBtXjPS6vElAD5+fAP9AbKhju6gMH8GP0CJSzbeyOty43vJ4ijc56PqrQoOSwj0OK+Bw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8557:: with SMTP id u23mr99227ljj.45.1597363294312; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 17:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] (ip-89-161-2-137.tel.tkb.net.pl. [89.161.2.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm1504558lfs.4.2020.08.13.17.01.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 17:01:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <834kp6my0u.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185078 Archived-At: >>> Is it certain that the Emacs manuals are always processed using >>> the texinfo.tex that comes with that same version of Emacs? >> >> (...) > > In general, texinfo.tex comes with the Texinfo package, and is > installed in some system-wide directory. That we in Emacs have the > latest unreleased version is fine, but if someone processes the > Emacs manual with the older system-wide version, they will stumble > on this new feature. > > However, I don't know if this is a real danger, hence my question. Ah, someone may use texinfo.tex form Texinfo package instead of - e.g - newest one, got it. Well, texinfo.tex is in emacs.texi.tar.gz (manual in TEXI format), so I think that's like saying: "use this version of texinfo.tex (or maybe newer)", and if someone uses older... well, his choice, but it may not work. Therefore that's not a problem, I guess. S. U.