Re: [Worg] CSS improvements

[Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>]

On 3/28/24 08:18, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:
> 
>>> I guess we can make this into a poll... (I have no better ideas on
>>> how to resolve the disagreement)
>>
>> I think that's unnecessary.  Worg isn't a democracy, after all.  If you
>> are vetoing the idea, then let it be vetoed, and let us move on with the
>> rest of the proposed changes.  I'll go ahead and push them, without the
>> background color.
> 
> It is not about democracy or veto. We disagree about expectations for
> #+begin_center. Expectations are not about me or you, but rather about
> what WORG authors will expect. So, asking people makes sense.

If you feel strongly enough about the background color idea (which would 
be an interesting reversal ;), I'll leave that in your hands. 
Otherwise, I don't feel strongly enough about it to pursue a poll.

> Also, we may consider re-using inlinetask style for TODO: entries.
> 
> Rather than
> #+begin_center
> TODO: Even better, find a volunteer to maintain this information!
> #+end_center
> 
> We can do
> 
> **************************** TODO Even better, ...

That is a lot of asterisks, and I can't remember if inline tasks are 
enabled by default.  :)  But in general, sure, I've no objection.  I 
think that we should have some standard way to encode tasks within Worg 
documents, regardless of what it is.

Thanks,
Adam