From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:19:08 +0530 Message-ID: References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231134570 26169 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 05:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 05:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 06:50:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJiMJ-0000Ly-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:50:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJiL3-0006tl-RM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:49:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJiKy-0006tg-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJiKv-0006tU-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48082 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJiKv-0006tR-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.185]:34331) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJiKt-0004cj-Oh; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:49:12 -0500 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so5608213tia.10 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:49:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=f7syKYMHM4ifD5s/0szkWHWkBUuTDwjj6s/s8hHkvKs=; b=FcdZgHKbR3m7MZtPHlkMjlt07T3NK4x9z2YdS5IPLlpVwWLLtk23sfNs2KgPIzK5AC OdGS6nzR/KcBH2u0d5QaD8TXbcV/s1iGio72f+Yc/8Us96gSXhTlVfr3GNU5yp9ld88t /O5FgL3P6Z6pKmj2uetasPz0iVKPXatnwPzog= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=oa/kbpxvsdUNJQIb5U7zdWX3qxw3boxBE0JAkP9KwKtChUIZ6kkrGtceRz5m+lYxLK OdsynENEaAnCyr+tC9Y4RdS8toVjX3Zk+f4av/wN+RTHxbCjrl81H+W0LIx3OO2RCK01 5EIY2DyShN1Kh/4RORa/Q3INbUIW0yWh+UM5I= Original-Received: by 10.110.20.15 with SMTP id 15mr13563851tit.29.1231134548847; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:49:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.110.8.12 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:49:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107595 Archived-At: Hello, On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > to the git performance numbers by the OP: > >> > I am updating bzr from their development branch and hence have the >> > latest and greatest. When I run a 'bzr pull' on Emacs repo daily, it >> > is running for >15 mins versus less than 3 mins for git. This is a > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > "Less than 3 mins" is too slow, if what I've heard about git is > correct. Maybe the OP was testing that on Windows. My git timings were not scientific. Please do not use it verbatim. It was used to just show the difference as a factor. git is fastest followed by hg, based on repeated tests I have done. I am not testing CVS because feature wise, CVS does not fall into dVCS category. Just a thought: Since hg is supported by Savannah, why not Emacs enjoy a hg mirror on Savannah? Should not take too much effort to set it up. I would love another GNU package (bzr) serve all of GNU development but IMHO, it is quite far from being there. -dhruva -- Contents reflect my personal views only!