From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:39:06 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <86ejae96t4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <878x0lvt6e.fsf@hbox.dyndns.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205582963 10453 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2008 12:09:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Martin Geisler" Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sat Mar 15 13:09:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaVCt-0004mY-JW for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:09:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaVCI-0004jL-UF; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaVCG-0004j0-Tc for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:09:09 +0000 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j2so1681449tid.4 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.11.10 with SMTP id 10mr3722656tik.44.1205582946548; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.3.13 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:09:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878x0lvt6e.fsf@hbox.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38641 gmane.emacs.devel:92671 Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Martin Geisler wrote: > And even if you have several heads in your Mercurial repository, you can > certainly still pull in new changesets. I have seen it and have used it too. The problem comes (from my experience) when you have to push. I agree you can create a new named branch and just pull in changes or do a forced pull which will create a new head. Suppose I want to keep multiple named branches active and yet push to a remote repository from one of the named branch, IMO it is not possible with mercurial. I would be happy to know if there is a way to do it. -dhruva