From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speed of bzr, how to use it, etc. Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:30:00 +0530 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205564426 31827 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2008 07:00:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 15 08:00:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaQNy-0003QV-9x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:00:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaQNN-0007RC-9M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaQNH-0007Ne-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaQNC-0007Gz-KS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaQNC-0007Gq-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaQNB-00011g-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.186]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaQNA-0004V0-Ty for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so1516977tia.10 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=M+nhafPDknpx29J7cZMIGFQB/lif34sgdQMkiaQhysc=; b=bNYRYztrb0NFaC5vNYuKJ3SOjneWvWFc1GUM2xq8hqNh5Sr6WLyGHEY1wCFHUkSOYp7LjsAVuB+plGoWVkvSNaOYMxQ2crBrjpv1xYhf2IlSXAiEzs8Z49k/HZZEAQbxqGOKKPMsO/LHeMRXHxgH5gx370MNAWy2J/W0vAibhNI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gzIpsZ3A0CwbMY8t1gaPEzNoS4+jEj4VCXlQjbtuzmVgVfljLcoYpISTkOSB8LIduUpIWY7/hSNzL2XwYBZT7J+xwHlmXwEiM4FrgVRMw7/526B8lRu06Ve/pEsdTALedkSIOe7qzvXjhAEfIed7dnpjQM5pxJY/JJMnjZykBy4= Original-Received: by 10.110.14.12 with SMTP id 12mr3712960tin.1.1205564400900; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.3.13 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92657 Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > A lot of people are arguing about various technical > questions about how fast bzr is, or how it could be faster, etc. > > Would people please move that to a list about bzr? We are discussing in the context of Emacs. Since bzr was/is being considered as a serious alternative (to CVS) SCM for hosting, IMHO the emacs maintainers and the stake holders should be aware of the shortcomings or features before making that final decision. Moving it into a different mailing list will help bzr but not emacs. -dhruva -- Contents reflect my personal views only!