From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50 compile problem on Windows XP Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:23:59 +0530 Message-ID: References: <47035169.8070402@gnu.org> <4703869F.6070909@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191574455 4100 80.91.229.12 (5 Oct 2007 08:54:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sridhar_ml@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 05 10:54:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Idiwl-0001Ka-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:54:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Idiwg-0003Xt-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Idiwd-0003Ws-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Idiwb-0003U7-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Idiwb-0003Tc-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Idiwa-0000S5-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so393359nfh for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dsNAeHS15czID+wmvecVE5WU94p/yKH+9uUiKzo2Sds=; b=nyelt55xZBDXSvE8hV1Bd4Pxa6tvSFYdkCm9n8xNLF33kIB1IitnfiHQBj2G/U83fb11+IHbu4x89ejYdaqloBDCqP7m5tgCnFIsy/dze9VUuvdXUDdbNAeFJTDOEVXFCiMdSpWTnb8rBp4W94oErW/m0jS6/DMvHKkylbAuqeA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ofcye11v62XKHrvLzCWcQmwEQYrdB18g31eVwiZeKVoR6zfhH82JbY8l6WScS32cOqA/tTyjDEg48tg/iF7rca4APmTTKW9ziXLgHd42wh8/2c+MwUuUpaoynvdbDgCHXAk7KHNTYwcha0G0FrE82krz5HA4d7pd0DWFiezS8IQ= Original-Received: by 10.78.81.20 with SMTP id e20mr8576528hub.1191574439316; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.205.1 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:53:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80281 Archived-At: Hi, On 10/5/07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 13:51:25 +0530 > > From: dhruva > > Cc: "Jason Rumney" , sridhar_ml@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > 182 int __cdecl abs(int); > > Thanks. Jason was right, it's the macro `abs' vs `abs' the library > function. I always found this limitation in the language. There is no way to test for a redefinition of a symbol (aka boundp). Only macros can be checked for redifinition. Is there some other way to do this sort of check in C/C++? -dky -- Dhruva Krishnamurthy Contents reflect my personal views only!