From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [andrew.maguire@ge.com: Emacs 22.1 hung after delete-process] Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:12:47 +0530 Message-ID: References: <46C404AD.8040908@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187268291 14968 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2007 12:44:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jason Rumney" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 14:44:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILeiW-0002X6-6M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:44:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILeiV-0002NO-KW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:44:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILegd-0001uQ-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILegb-0001ti-L1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:42:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILegb-0001tV-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILega-00045J-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so135297nfh for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:42:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DmG/BWnN8dbKUVj3rrZ9KuS2MJrG2hAWM5Va/9KNLzrSOMO/+tIcPBF+RcV5aMvy4p28rYycvftWvsJrjYNicNffXPYwkxgu3NlogFIaM1SRL4EY/fG89gOTs8t2yLnUulwOl5PKD2pxK7dzsEA+VEvTtCepHWPLJWOSUqCtpic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pEVnDBot6zxi2yNBIaSGIIoReZRQcrMPnjles3gN1S22vUCukzejA7+svy7lFmoSdkcaGLOXAUSroKRPiDijUsJaBxY2BaaPX/I3xfaG/rC2jx7TWWwyck8IUjMh+tNUT+G4QgEhifxuzYZ8HyXqXxp5gxsBz2HgQNH9/1+VPU4= Original-Received: by 10.78.206.9 with SMTP id d9mr601090hug.1187268167228; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.206.20 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:42:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46C404AD.8040908@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76625 Archived-At: Hi, On 8/16/07, Jason Rumney wrote: > Glenn Morris wrote: > > Or is the issue that trying to trap SIGHUP somehow creates an hung > > perl process on Windows? Is delete-process supposed to be graceful in > > such cases? > > > > It seems to. Windows does not have real signals, so both perl and Emacs > are translating those to whatever the respective developers thought was > the closest equivalent in Windows. When Emacs tries to delete But, how is the VS.NET build able to handle this? I was not able to reproduce in the VS.NET build. Could it be any way related to having PERL built using MSVC (Visual studio compiler) and Emacs built using GCC (MinGW) compiler? -dky -- Dhruva Krishnamurthy Contents reflect my personal views only!