From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Brent Goodrick" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1848: 23.0.60; isearch-forward fails to find colon characters in Info buffers Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:25:28 -0800 Message-ID: References: <18792.57415.297530.40046@hungover.brentg.com> <87k591ibbz.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Brent Goodrick , 1848@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_254707_16392848.1231773928535" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231775093 4442 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2009 15:44:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1848@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 12 16:46:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LMOyj-0002dW-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:45:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41382 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOxT-00008R-MU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOwx-0007wb-2f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOwt-0007sI-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48027 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMOwt-0007rl-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:40090) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LMOws-0007u0-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:30 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n0CFhPro026490; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:43:26 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n0CFZ3LP024175; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:35:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Brent Goodrick" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1848 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1848-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1848.123177393322794 (code B ref 1848); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1848) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Jan 2009 15:25:33 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n0CFPUx2022788 for <1848@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:25:31 -0800 Original-Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so3398406ywj.31 for <1848@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:25:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=yL6KZN8EU8MOUwMaQ0Mvox9awThWElY4VYLaqdYtqw8=; b=nIT7Xhf0Np+1lfdVH2cJs4VB6nqorozoQJOPB7X6AJVnHVU0TP78oehP8tEsBOyBmW 3TgtaNYE0GlyAXTpBVy+w+FHLVDgQNVyIJSJ51NzU5N6sFjbcFi256CU99UBuXtP3HBm +R2z0S9pguBB30zKoh1dDz4sTf/7mpRjigE+Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=vjP40Yb10PYJR0lt41Dq99i0Vr9w5zEEY5Of7ywOPRuQmJ0l32BkHk7oeiu334ARMO PzjAGdHevZ6UiqrT/YazYukF6WuDEi65KR0ulLwErx2tJe16aBLxBQDXbZRV7GMSn5LP AzbUud/oXd36YzaTDQhZ1LGNIYSXqrfhmBqyc= Original-Received: by 10.90.50.5 with SMTP id x5mr13784110agx.23.1231773928539; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:25:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.90.115.12 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:25:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:43:31 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24027 Archived-At: ------=_Part_254707_16392848.1231773928535 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sounds reasonable to me. Brent On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> That's correct, in Emacs 23 C-s doesn't find invisible characters > >> in Info. This is an intentional change, not a bug. Please see > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/95142 > > > I found it a bit confusing that setting search-invisible to t makes no > > difference to the behaviour here. Should Info-search-success-function > > respect search-invisible? > > I'd say yes. Does anyone object? > > > Stefan > ------=_Part_254707_16392848.1231773928535 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sounds reasonable to me.

Brent

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> That's correct, in Emacs 23 C-s doesn't find invisible characters
>> in Info.  This is an intentional change, not a bug.  Please see
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/95142

> I found it a bit confusing that setting search-invisible to t makes no
> difference to the behaviour here. Should Info-search-success-function
> respect search-invisible?

I'd say yes.  Does anyone object?


       Stefan

------=_Part_254707_16392848.1231773928535--