From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "paul r" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:13:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87od9wt19m.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87tzjnvjhc.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204564488 14725 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2008 17:14:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Karl Fogel" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 03 18:15:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWEFE-0002at-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:14:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWEEg-0007vl-PY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:13:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWEEL-0007lc-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWEEH-0007jU-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWEEH-0007jN-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWEEG-0001cv-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so219188muf.0 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:13:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=whVDbWsIC2JTYhKGyxEZkz32NtvQQZURNpG4mbTSTFg=; b=p87fNbOtMmHvNmrU4XEatNlUYnC9kctPcxBc6XYbRfdVh/Z/wYEOm8xFbgKbmISFmcPtfD7eRL7RNFQho4PloWX/kyt7n8F18L5TLean8aYlHm3l57IX0/EOHFzGq2qVUba5KGRJVmwC699Vu7O+dcx6ozORZhb/EsiQ9aFTnmY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pYlJyMmPKlkZnvfkaC7T2wuF3hHswVxA5oqLWTyrmbGcap6DGTIEmRY2qlqmqDPB2xBKfdZnzaROLLG+cAah/CSey617GqT3PlijCeWnBO2ncnODszsBghhDOjFtmviLgtPDNXVq5zjYrMvJUsuykt/IZTJMwvJEQLLxrbJI7mU= Original-Received: by 10.82.166.9 with SMTP id o9mr515928bue.27.1204564407798; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:13:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.175.3 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:13:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87tzjnvjhc.fsf@red-bean.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91190 Archived-At: 2008/3/3, Karl Fogel : > "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Romain Francoise wrote: > >> Do you see the SCM switch (to bzr) happening before or after 23.1? > > > > And, it is decided then that it *will* be to Bazaar? > as a person considering to enter into emacs development one day, this really is an important step. I did a fairly complete audit last week of DVCS solutions that could suit emacs need, and it turned out that, both from the technical point of view, and for the emacs people tastes, bzr and hg (mercurial) meet requirements and are almost indistinguishable products. Darcs is an other one, fairly different, but mature and written in Haskell. sorry for the noise if it has been largely discussed before. paul