From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62507: 28.2; Crash when editing TODO line with malformed tag Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:21:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83o7ob7rkb.fsf@gnu.org> <10ececa33f114e01082a@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6903"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 62507@debbugs.gnu.org To: Patrick Brennan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 17:22:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1phu6R-0001Qy-Hz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:22:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phu6G-0002K5-VG; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phu6E-0002Jh-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phu6E-0005IU-Bp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phu6E-0002NG-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62507.16801897159112 (code B ref 62507); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2023 15:21:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phu66-0002Mu-RE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:21:55 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:60444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phu64-0002Ml-D5 for 62507@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:21:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1680189711; bh=amTDSLDLWJ/vUGf0todORGl1tgFx7dWqbxmKn/tcwUE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=UchBxlWWQnb3jpPZetDJpnMLLPhIpEB9uzfw4xTcwKedCCm/7xu8dATlsmM0CJWum mGys3ac7SfywkaFN7KEMFeO7Zwq45kbYIkHG4JttOib3JMZ0WM6va23oToL5TSnExz 7FeH1Nj9DgfSQW7s/YAV023x24YCrkEtUYOI36fKSIESNNbDoDyhIb1tb0xbWIA9yu FvWxdF4B6k6dOZkgN2CXY4kBl9p3WmFiEXhDnzWcsL3IDj/TnZ5LJdayz7dEhWZp1B 0vs8YMlhDWpdqGUJiysr+DG//W8W0ynGtdBSAdKo23WIt7KMC7dZlq1K98EhLV+Xyo 72DvL/meeOFeA== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:258931 Archived-At: > > I can't reproduce the bug using that same recipe either. So now I think > I may have made a mistake in exactly how the recipe is to be followed. > However, I am fairly sure that there is some way to make emax crash > using malformed tags using approximately the same procedure. As far as I > know, emax at Google is stock. > Thanks. Can we close this bug? If you find a better recipe, you can always file another bug report.