From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1305: All code that currently beeps should use visual bell instead Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 02:28:49 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87blabpy54.fsf@gnus.org> <0d7924a2-d09f-e2d0-f0e7-6b5ee3a7a7f2@yandex.ru> <192e82f20f5deb690394@heytings.org> <87zgxmjkr9.fsf@gnus.org> <874kfs3585.fsf@gnus.org> <87v987z53l.fsf@gnus.org> <8fba78a42ee78011f182@heytings.org> <80b9aa43-9924-ae07-df60-87dde8c17378@yandex.ru> <8fba78a42eb8bd480d61@heytings.org> <3a17b49f-2a5c-42b6-4375-7544b67fd471@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2679"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: Alan Third , 1305@debbugs.gnu.org, Michael Welsh Duggan , Stefan Kangas , jasonspiro4@gmail.com, Stefan Monnier , Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 01:29:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZJ-0000Zc-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 01:29:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZI-0005q4-IR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZC-0005pw-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZB-0001fc-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:29:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZB-0005iX-Qf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 23:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1305 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 1305-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1305.161982533921969 (code B ref 1305); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 23:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 23:28:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60022 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZ8-0005iF-Mb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:42628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lccZ7-0005i3-Ld for 1305@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:28:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id l2so19951940wrm.9 for <1305@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:28:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9yiPUl+5MmMkNmGi8EQEF3rXZm7FQg9x2ttNjF1iJ6M=; b=NsD+tjjDa7kbsTYEOioxQM0ZyeMLhugZae4I42ij8icST61CLVcH/AdQUjMx+DKjIq OtqGTR/Z9vE2QylHw1QazVQ9Hy0MDulfBNeuUlz+EELht3rr5mGejyMd3kaxPP6sqgzh D/tF56qhRoPpzxtW9CbjL6V5ifhCTJdtm7LdyniwAl36tiraesIupqEVHFM0MA7RU/VR BM9auNeijOWjczSMqBqTvHHeKNrXeDWUYk3bXDPMIDVQH4okHhPnbY6hgQUuC4wpv6Sg vJLpnanZAdbDM3ghFOE8k2ReWal6Ro/zPsFdwGSZbaK2APPbxNsvQ/MCpJid2BFy3d5U AvBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9yiPUl+5MmMkNmGi8EQEF3rXZm7FQg9x2ttNjF1iJ6M=; b=XypDlVrlKsgJHeL231HUzcaazwP/PUpOlyE0b12RjFOlh8a7LqWjR0JW4EfEUn8Hm5 zzIYiX7i8IUvJQ6o1mFGvIVF7HbOBp/hZ0Jr1izjNlmSN3XAw6xlUP+pdvO9dLyjpFPL I7HOgHFJyXBP/7P9q3aqAjngO1eoTpJBKftmll87VsrYD9eqQHnwLcVtT6XEWH9UidyZ nVFi8vgK4RDYUTn/QvimTEaUGSCmE48KZcTmipQj0S30T1mb3JwtPAOO5/+fXqOHPKU0 FJhJPhjADEJPedpLs5xyNlPpceur0Sstyg/qr4M94fmnFXKvmuNvcTE1zNncRjpcIayM S4cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MKvOzrCUi/OVx33loGJhH+CR47A879+5TDffms2Pboe7GEqMt QjMsOGewq8w84zd7RQAeGfA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2beif8IHFBOTxDyvsnv9b2bo/DoJekF9YBGJ1+U0RRansnnPhL50rOZRGPKxm2Knx9snsjw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:de8b:: with SMTP id w11mr10272770wrl.315.1619825331815; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f25sm4069069wrd.67.2021.04.30.16.28.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205305 Archived-At: On 01.05.2021 02:19, Gregory Heytings wrote: > Amusingly, it's the only "better default" that isn't described in the > README, and against which there's a open issue: > https://github.com/technomancy/better-defaults/issues/27 . Have you read the comments? People complain about macOS behavior, and the first proposed "fix" was to make it work close to how it works on GNU/Linux (except flashing the mode-line, probably because that is easier to implement). Hence the reply: "that's strange; the behavior you describe is how it already works for me". >> A moving reddish shape should bring enough attention, but of course >> different users have different levels of sensitivity (as the >> discussion in bug#47574 has shown). Only a practical experiment can tell. >> > > Moving???  Why do you think this would be better than simply blinking > the echo area? "Blinking" is also movement. I don't have a specific animation in mind.