From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next emacs version? Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:39:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <56D10E2523764AC98D99CEBC55DBAD93@us.oracle.com> <83iq8sigyq.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3z0i3nu.fsf@gnu.org> <911BA1D06CEB4306924D0069BA2D3DFF@us.oracle.com> <83bpeki18a.fsf@gnu.org> <83aau4hv38.fsf@gnu.org> <0E10B96B5C814EE8B95B57972F13E189@us.oracle.com> <5E984B3C-4B86-4FA6-8675-4C8501CC2285@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269052888 31697 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2010 02:41:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org discussions" To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 03:41:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsocs-0003LS-Mt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:41:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38523 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nsocr-00071T-TI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NsobD-0006fo-1M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60067 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsobB-0006f5-8E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:39:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsob8-0000Fp-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:39:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com ([209.85.220.210]:62334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nsob8-0000Fe-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1133768fxm.26 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:39:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=IqqgU46doG4dBznEiRsAVFmUDA19wSVWZ4HNptVPpZo=; b=juKRFpMNM9/UbQbo23oH7Bt+6u90WdSH6ZfC4R2W/DHbafpA2ioTeG8mMggR1leKV8 2kthzuvVNcerp5JUu/gSXYRQhAcPgVgm0laSZtiXuUgXIjqCn6Z99XC+OtzLhS3JTkKZ caYzYu4ZmtWW3ZcvpKGokKIefgsGOnIThVv6s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=AkdLI6Oc4NTEr3rUQisbFJv6WYwxcXzC5h5UT7HYIdHe18rxBKjNQfal4cg4EWS+Cj B5XjQGb25RH0ATEylLRcY7IQ++IP9YnB6prRZwZaDeSZKx8STyyNPjXEcoSTWM7pBYPV tJSDCVbLqqZzSHZfWIbc+A/PFOvDiQcH6ZSqk= Original-Received: by 10.239.190.79 with SMTP id w15mr1697573hbh.123.1269052773141; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:39:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5E984B3C-4B86-4FA6-8675-4C8501CC2285@raeburn.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122332 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Ken Raeburn wrote: > > Unless you want to start putting bzr revision numbers into the emacs version string (which I think is a bad idea), that's going to be the case. But perhaps having the bzr version available in another variable in the build Emacs would be a good idea?