From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How does M-x completion works Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:34:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266856538 19000 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2010 16:35:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne=29?= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 17:35:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NjbFt-0005EZ-9M for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:35:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NjbFs-0001kQ-Mq for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:35:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NjbFD-0001ar-QY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53683 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NjbFC-0001ZF-QH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NjbFC-0002rD-0h for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:34:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:60140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NjbFB-0002qx-RI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:34:49 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1903756bwz.26 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:34:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mYqqjzs5OJBEeXccu8Bq6Mq9iaATEp7wCU6h0C6+fjo=; b=M+ZlWqmI3LqOdaxqF+WUiQcSqxIB5uwqnwGiefyRquNePbGJSd7M+Fbr2Udr1GdMGe 5sQ/ktju7K9ikbxeNP1+UE7k7gCB/RSI0418I5pSbxMNUdNXxOO3WW7vchsyI1gwsGpO GjKAl1fXXdZLw4MMGBv4Y12xUqz1zfzheUzIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VMMcEZF4ImLBi/UO276l/Yj40ZzC6ca1bji6SNa5ggJdKnrUuyKDmHdM1vdsfNTdtw mbEwvD1Av/l65cPPYynfGIEUIv1BNZQxQ37+YVpSd0lcM0kX/wuQSnAQR5m8RTzEJDuL Ad53NjNxd4dt0LiZFEBoov2+GccRqUJi0eobQ= Original-Received: by 10.239.189.76 with SMTP id s12mr1600324hbh.111.1266856488188; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:34:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:72022 Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=C3=AAne) wrote: > Hi boys and girls, Hi Yannic, Maybe it would be easier for you if you first tried to describe for yourself what you really want to do? > I was stripping off from my Emacs on Windows, every things I do not need = or > use (or which is not design as I would like). But something does not seem= s > logical to me : as an example, I have removed the Allout package > (allout.el), Ok, but when I do a M-x TAB, allout-mode is still there (and > obviously fails if I hit ENTER, as I've removed it). I've run search for > allout inclusions in all *.el files, but this did not solve the trick. > > Do some one know how M-x completion works ? Is it hard coded in the Emacs > executable ? > > By the way, is there somewhere a document which would describe the base l= ine > of the Emacs architecture ? This may be useful to me to figure out what i= s > really optional and what is not. > > Have a nice day > > -- > No-no, this isn't an oops ...or I hope (TM) - Don't blame me... I'm just = not > lucky >