From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest, and branching plans Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:11:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <873a0yhknd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <136A0B1647B74A53A26506F872BECC6E@us.oracle.com> <95D39F92A1704A86A6C032DD55973E6D@us.oracle.com> <83hbpbwv1t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266812198 23729 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2010 04:16:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 01:57:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NizQO-0001kx-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:11:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NizQN-00029T-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NizQH-000285-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:11:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35857 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NizQG-00027B-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:11:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NizQF-0006Ml-FY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:11:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222]:46996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NizQF-0006Me-9O; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:11:43 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1360652fxm.26 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:11:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nCJQy122f4uMwiYUgtYkEFnCFFzauhmeu/gr48W1cx0=; b=JrINeqF/qYrI8PGWxlmlReyVyXOrlReAu3FFY9pFJzgTmWkFCd0ihuerfhGm5w4MMM cd+iq0pSkjHypGIwOz6qCB6e2gRj0RIm/tBjrODDkTipkUE11uWCIWeLqhoLk/Kxnwfs lBMYl5CudzQaDE0dyQWMnbKYP1l1xTnrHgO6E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=MJ/8BbOvUqnCNZNWiicU15Aav8akPOs0+DiF+m6b/zp7+TUR9JLb1LwMRKRYPIXAzd BXJAQXOD1PnWGiAoScETnyjXn37MPB0/1DjJzwjWYktPC2UHUfIF+HI+0j+La+ycshuH G2217CK5TS/3dfbw3F505f/SDxMUpSkyoTFD4= Original-Received: by 10.239.188.199 with SMTP id q7mr1429752hbh.12.1266711102197; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:11:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83hbpbwv1t.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121270 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Do you really want bug reports from Windows users? > > Yes, and you know that. I just uploaded new unpatched binaries as I told. However I wonder if I was uploading the right thing from a pretest point of view. If I already have Emacs sources checked out (which I have of course) is there a way to build pretest binaries from what I have? I have no idea about how the branches and bazaar works for this.