From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest, and branching plans Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:08:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <873a0yhknd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <136A0B1647B74A53A26506F872BECC6E@us.oracle.com> <83iq9rx0bk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266808044 4721 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2010 03:07:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sdl.web@gmail.com, Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 21:53:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Niuhd-00062O-VI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:09:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiuhY-0007NO-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:09:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NiuhS-0007KL-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46300 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiuhR-0007IM-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:09:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiuhR-0006Xr-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222]:40089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiuhR-0006Xm-2u; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1216523fxm.26 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:09:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7nRX+4J+VaVfL4DY9azBbgTKpldH9wwGyinyiJ6jrJk=; b=FFhC+1lzX8UzeuU25yS5OFDPj+21+oME4Tgawm/wQJw7xcfyujVfgAfnSGk0YeP89e kKrYea58qRI/ZTKgbaJpl0ITk8zMVTF9INEmFxehiE5fBgicG4q1rRdIwF/FeX2T40Ob G7wIDogyILYn47Th+9g1DZgh6L+heqEzwB1KI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dBz+4ijEp+fL3zTl1sf4CwN3tpzPOLocfLZWaW8ontLajIRCN1D0nEHlsLS7jZfndk uoOHirVj2RRNz4q3kIvffL0+pPivxwgF9V3cX8BuNx3eNIOAXUzclDAJhcumnuGaqdXn Wz/5i5qF6NILJwAUxv/1EfEnnJQKHT9CprlRM= Original-Received: by 10.239.158.66 with SMTP id t2mr1303697hbc.184.1266692947841; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:09:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83iq9rx0bk.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121265 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > It's not clear what statistics you have to back this up. =C2=A0I know for= a > fact that several users of the Windows port build Emacs themselves; > what percentage that is of the overall number of people who use the > pretest on Windows should be a subject of survey, not guesswork. There actually use to be many people downloading prebuilt binaries from my site (most people prefer my patched version then). But I have not checked how many downloads there are for a very long time.