From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5299: 23.1.91; Cannot send bug report - get error no such file /bin/bash Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:33:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <08F75B41711A41D78AD59BC40BE7CDCD@us.oracle.com> <833a2ndmej.fsf@gnu.org> <0E03B09EADFE4F3EA73EAB56B6597A00@us.oracle.com> <83zl4vc6o2.fsf@gnu.org> <65D8407786864646A3A1B10044E69D30@us.oracle.com> <79AEE181041744B1B03DF8510872733D@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Lennart Borgman , 5299@debbugs.gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262555403 14043 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2010 21:50:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 21:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5299@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 03 22:49:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRYKh-0007Dh-2U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:49:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46924 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRYKh-0007Ws-Fg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:49:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRYKH-0007NT-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:49:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRYK6-0007JR-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48051 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRYK6-0007JM-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:49:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.43] (port=43025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRYK6-0008Jy-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:49:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRY5K-000272-3f; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: Lennart Borgman , 5299@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5299 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5299-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5299.12625544118112 (code B ref 5299); Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5299) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2010 21:33:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRY4o-00026n-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:33:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com ([209.85.220.226]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRY4l-00026g-5U for 5299@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:33:29 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so12840480fxm.39 for <5299@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:33:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gga4SmvgPQJgo2AuncabhzNxW+3Ov79Lvmt8lyKjegk=; b=CVwVFEMUFepZnjWhnZNskW3iBfVZXI8XK5HGdxGe2f5fX3/Y+2Vm7T8NCnXsFDtRbD kvX0WBlXkui7AHe1qTSVmGTj7mOeY3Do7xIkH48HWhV9FPxx+M6NapG88Q4GT3OLzBSj 2Pj74LY9gxVLgkFMCqbybHr6WvrxnjcI5ztSg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=GcH1CqXGz4idAAAxOrDuyOsKrJWXzGn5jCZ1xrYJ9eyKbdWQShjRkV1nhRxrHa9Csd W0pVzuuxsqZeoQRiR3BdBB+hU7zezI6VjPcLpFL58asY0EBTguqKBpaBSUawTxZtkQEc /s22zhLdOxTlgAmBUq6sAn60ksFj5wg+o2PCA= Original-Received: by 10.239.188.4 with SMTP id n4mr869907hbh.78.1262554400615; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:33:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <79AEE181041744B1B03DF8510872733D@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:34:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33906 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > > In that case, yes, as I already indicated in detail earlier, I pasted the true > bug-report content to the email message prepared by Emacs (via my mail client). > Please read my earlier message that details this. Sorry, I missed the message where you described this. Yes, you were using the workaround I described. > But I don't even get to that stage now. I don't get an email-client message > created. I doubt that Outlook is ever invoked in any way. As soon as I type > `yes' to confirm that I want to send a bug report, the error is raised. > >> > Are you able to reproduce the bug using Jason's pretest >> > build and `emacs -Q'? > > Well, are you? Have you tried using Jason's build with emacs -Q and an external > email client? That is the first thing to try. I believed it stopped working at some time, but I thought it was due to some trouble I had with the gmail (additional) workaround (or maybe some bad merge in my patched version) so I did not look further. I have had a bit mess trying to get the gmail add-on to work. I would prefer not to test at the moment.