From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Meaning of Common Lisp Warning Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:38:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1269fa50-c565-42c6-a544-bc38ebab26af@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <87d43044hc.fsf@galatea.local> <20091130141720.GB24284@tomas> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259595592 18353 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2009 15:39:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 16:39:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NF8Lo-0005Wi-Rh for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:39:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8Lo-0004MO-HB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:39:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8LN-0004M1-OQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:39:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8LI-0004LZ-5M for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42816 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8LH-0004LW-Vz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.211.172]:64071) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NF8LH-0006kC-S2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:39:11 -0500 Original-Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so3392456ywh.27 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:39:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IEW21FBYB/T7YwUJRfciB89t5BjpWwNTPNuKlBviJME=; b=B/AqliKfaIG0iKIjV5H2zFUh7zXuKWrwSpo0xhOTfYYqIJzFXG2cEWUby1nt9FRzJx +QAKE7dQFtd1bcmQYaqPqvHfPcJjw9R+3viEcgZaY7fK9INvbzTt3TdD6MP1Stc8MhiM PuKHBPNUv6mZN3DiXYrTExLA2pdt47N0CQjL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IwHuayo6l06BmxMp3d3uuF629p9BJ8W5/6H8lqe5gpFLECUlwtAFvgBg5MEt3h6/4Z VlFl+W+DX/BN/+54GN8vUz5XIJKFsR/APoW8AT/bH9HwKJ/ubUZt3Xo3qnVCZiaQg0HO 0mKLVsf20neWVuE06PEt1X3zU9Anugu3hp2TE= Original-Received: by 10.101.170.11 with SMTP id x11mr1462520ano.109.1259595551142; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:39:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091130141720.GB24284@tomas> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:70258 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:17 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:49:35PM +0100, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote: >> Nordl=C3=B6w writes: > >> No it is because the authors of emacs are stubborn. =C2=A0They don't wan= t >> people to write emacs code with these common lisp like functions. There has been subtle technical problems using the cl package because of name clashes with Emacs functions/macros. I do not know if anyone is sure they are resolved yet. (I have seen subtle problems.) >> Just ignore this warning. > > Agreed: if you aren't aiming at developing a core Emacs package you can > safely ignore that. You can perhaps, but not people using your packages. Wouldn't it be better to just follow the advice, use (eval-when-compile (require 'cl)) What is the problem with doing that?