Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs

[Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>      This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public
>      License.  Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work under any
>      other license that grants the right to use, copy, modify, and/or
>      distribute the work, as long as that license imposes the restriction
>      that derivative works have to grant the same rights and impose the
>      same restriction. For example, you may choose to receive this work
>      under the GNU Free Documentation License, the CreativeCommons
>      ShareAlike License, the XEmacs manual license, or similar licenses."
>
>    So that allows the GPLv3, as well as many other licenses.
>
> I know; I read that before.  I think that does not alloq GPLv3.
> Section 7 of GPLv3 allows some limited variation in the licenses of
> derivative works, so it does not fit the criterion.
>
> So I think we have a real problem here.
>
> Who runs the site?


EmacsWiki? http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AlexSchroeder