From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: p tags and indenting in Html Mode Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:42:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7ctyzop7gg.fsf@pbourguignon.anevia.com> <4a9e6212.0c58560a.78a1.ffffb4fc@mx.google.com> <4a9e8fda.1438560a.4d30.2eb4@mx.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251906313 22343 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2009 15:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Richard Riley Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 02 17:45:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mis1A-0002ej-I8 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:45:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mis1A-0006qz-1W for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Miryr-00065u-Jz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:42:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Miryo-000640-1n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:42:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41240 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Miryn-00063v-Qu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f200.google.com ([209.85.210.200]:60346) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Miryn-0002OI-GY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: by yxe38 with SMTP id 38so1281635yxe.6 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:42:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AxeMa37bwERS1Ip9Zn7ToeBi1RHLG9CcdMNhZs3VTE0=; b=bNO9RfIvPZB+A97sztCeHbUJRjZptaCMr+tdUsYGnP6WjZhX7SXE1vieXmvufrrWJO yBm1rFG0zxWrGZBUkB9zdrD3i0ZcoZrXfQ3Dv3BgfsFpiFt1H1Cwo/zeoQiM1OZ7qYyg 6UZZXQFZZHocA0rlUa9Lmdb4vHmX1Te+APiug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=voFx1AA619+LfOnRL/cOJkA+byrZirqYEJNVCM5uuJggiMZpvl8lmSe/fkuXc0fqVu P103+7FwNVOwAUj7BNzKFxOVFTEalk1z/VBzNzKkfHw6JSUqmnGsFHNn/ZyvWh74UZ78 8cizkCpDfOiCx08SNNnOCwNIoWHtXOIcUaJyA= Original-Received: by 10.101.91.10 with SMTP id t10mr9315057anl.161.1251906155162; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:42:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4a9e8fda.1438560a.4d30.2eb4@mx.google.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:67762 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Richard Riley wrote: > I'm not sure of the context of your meaning there when you say company > does not know how to get completion candidates. Company mode has three components: 1) A framework for tying backends (who gives comletion candidates) with frontends (who present the choices to the user). 2) A front end which presents the choices. 3) Some backends, for example the semantic backend. CompletionUI is similar in structure. > One thing thats excellent is the semantic backend : excellent completion > in C for example including libraries. Things like company-dabbrev make > suitable completion candidates for more general buffers. Yes, but notice that it is semantic that gives the completion candidates, not company-mode. > company and semantic seem to be the way for completion in emacs from > what I have seen and tried. The water is very muddy though with many > competing methods such as anything, ido and others : I'm really not even > sure where the overlaps in getting completion candidates occurs anymore. I think both company-mode and completionUI are attempt to give more structure to this, see 1 and 2 above. I hope a mix of them can make its way into Emacs.