From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: xah@xahlee.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!)
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e01d8a50908091121y19d077e5i5bbfe9e8aa6c1168@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83fxc0lupm.fsf@gnu.org>
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:10:41 +0200
>> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
>> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, xah@xahlee.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> So you are saying that subgroups are bad because they do not give you
>> enough structure?
>
> I'm saying that subgroups called "advanced" are bad.
You said
In a good UI, each feature should be put under a group whose name
gives a hint that the feature could be reasonably looked up in that
group. Having group names such as "Advanced" or "More options", that
have no mnemonic value, is abusing the menus, which are supposed to
make the job of finding a feature _easier_, not harder.
Maybe the name "Advanced" is bad but we were talking about the
structure of the menus. Making a subgroup named "Advanced" is not bad
IMO since it is a subgroup with a context.
Rather, within that context it may be a very good mnemonic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-09 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-05 3:22 bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23! xah lee
2009-08-06 2:15 ` Richard Stallman
2009-08-08 16:11 ` Xah Lee
2009-08-09 3:36 ` Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) Stefan Monnier
2009-08-09 3:53 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 5:13 ` Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs Stefan Monnier
2009-08-09 17:20 ` Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 17:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:10 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 18:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:21 ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2009-08-09 18:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:54 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 19:07 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 23:00 ` Fiddling with the menus Jason Rumney
2009-08-09 23:14 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 23:46 ` Jason Rumney
2009-08-10 1:51 ` Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-08-10 3:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-10 3:26 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 2:27 ` Fiddling with the menus Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 2:32 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 5:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-09 9:51 ` CHENG Gao
2009-08-09 17:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:06 ` CHENG Gao
2009-08-09 18:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:24 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:59 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 22:54 ` Jason Rumney
2009-08-10 1:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-09 17:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 23:14 ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-10 2:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 3:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-11 5:06 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-08-11 13:03 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-09 12:37 ` Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) Florian Beck
2009-08-09 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 17:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 18:05 ` Fiddling with the menus Richard Riley
2009-08-09 18:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-10 2:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-10 3:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-09 23:09 ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-09 23:29 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-08-10 0:10 ` Drew Adams
2009-08-10 2:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-09 20:29 ` bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23! Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-10 2:34 Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) Xah Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e01d8a50908091121y19d077e5i5bbfe9e8aa6c1168@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=xah@xahlee.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.