From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Darkening font-lock colors Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:16:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d47hoox5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4A76481C.6000602@harpegolden.net> <87hbwp32ep.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <5908857581A447C3865D9DD2BA70BA16@us.oracle.com> <873a87p8ve.fsf@dd.chalmers.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249427821 6737 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2009 23:17:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:17:01 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 05 01:16:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MYTFT-0002Mo-J4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:16:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36722 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYTFS-0008Ds-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYTFN-0008Dk-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:16:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MYTFH-0008DS-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50454 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MYTFH-0008DP-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:56425) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MYTFH-00040g-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so7466046yxe.14 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:16:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BCv4kup5JSQtAqC5C2AWCRmx9HadqaV6+BUJGmmeNnI=; b=ukEK1VAUKldy9CXM+QpyERh8DLLu+v99nGN88IBtUhm4H0FSM8Coc2hLXnmIZ7Ebuu Y+cx64U9kSNdflYF60Ah6l0AAkMoZqh023vtxbyKsOTr8fi6OZrb4YEPfzsqbyzJbmhQ ldSscgKkwKJ1rDlBfoE1fPHo7avtWVeACeBoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HIwZQ209FIct2v0kg7l+YOucL/gI1WxEpa1v7eBDkmDr+iRJlsjVty9PYaQMP/7+zJ CC+tUOJpYoBbXiGNchgcCSIpYe7k00Ki8RaHZc3Alpq/lvItlHc+8o0SnkVC11swedXb AVhW6IM4PVdjTA2XwOXepPeUexHq6H023iZBs= Original-Received: by 10.100.123.5 with SMTP id v5mr6342462anc.137.1249427798619; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:16:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <873a87p8ve.fsf@dd.chalmers.se> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113690 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Johan Bockg=C3=A5rd wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >>> A face that has a foreground and a background that is different from >>> the page looks like a boxed heading. And a chunk of such text doesn't >>> look like a rectangular text box. It looks like a set of Lego blocks, >>> with varying right edges due to different line lengths. >> >> It sounds like it looks very different on your display. Could you >> perhaps show an image? > > http://www.emacswiki.org/pics/static/bojohan-face-background.png.png Hm, yes, I see the problem. Thos /* ... */ style comments can probably look very distracting if there are a lot of them. Sigh. Are there similar problems with strings and doc strings or are they more suited for background colors?