From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why Emacs should have a good web-browser Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocrjl2r6.fsf@gmail.com> <87zlb2bwyj.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87bpnefl73.fsf@gmail.com> <1248196427.7551.38.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <87prbt954b.fsf@comcast.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248206952 22897 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2009 20:09:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:09:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 21 22:09:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MTLe4-0004ak-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:09:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51005 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTLe3-0005d2-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTLdj-0005Uv-Bp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTLde-0005TO-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38593 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTLde-0005TI-El for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:54179) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTLdd-0006xu-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so5917500yxe.14 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:08:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hNi035EoAGmCJ83VXwLgwxxuNIlxY2ji4y4KmtJbVMc=; b=hz4RI+J3UXwwkZKCOkFJaRL3usrHdnfgrbkYRf1tHoYVHdlQmwy8CRBV+3tsqUSaZO k1lkv4CgbKrZKKS3DVUqRKivQAO8nJFKXRywf7e3mJy8HAuHunmvgHzW/aMacEl5bs8J nWexIa4CmovDuaOjyBwCSiLb/mxb5bNNulF+A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SO1vbxfLChKDBFBwEI4P5mhfOXbIHNde275y907q+tSKl5paslZDMo923VmlGnYrk/ wS9ctsVqiLJEKlcV6v2sRO9whJjQG9HORKrzpL9mJjjBTxO6DBy9ksGocw/zpNMUmHxO OVcKVNP9pPCHZBfD3fBXM9F9Z7RqOrAk87yeE= Original-Received: by 10.100.197.2 with SMTP id u2mr76576anf.138.1248206916327; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:08:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87prbt954b.fsf@comcast.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112951 Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Robert D. Crawford wro= te: > I will not pretend to understand everything that is being discussed. =C2= =A0I > am interested as a blind user, dependent on w3 and or emacs-w3m. =C2=A0So > far, I don't see how I will be able to use emacspeak to speak the > contents of a conqueror buffer like I can any other emacs buffer. =C2=A0A= m I > mistaken? Hi Robert, Is emacspeak in any way dependent on w3 or could it do equally well if emacs-w3m could use another web browser to do what it does now?