From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please make line-move-visual nil Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:56:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5f0ff9220906010736paad9321td86fd52326ebe722@mail.gmail.com> <87oct7sur8.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <31703F2EAE7D4CAF8E671B0C18916D01@us.oracle.com> <2E369A57A535414C8193711D4740ACC5@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243893395 22489 80.91.229.12 (1 Jun 2009 21:56:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 3438@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, "T.V. Raman" , Chong Yidong , "Andrew W. Nosenko" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, ishikawa , ams@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , stephen@xemacs.org, eliz@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 01 23:56:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MBFUY-0006wQ-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:56:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBFUX-0004t5-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBFUT-0004st-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBFUP-0004mY-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43513 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBFUO-0004mP-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:56:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:41680) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBFUM-0005rf-QZ; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:56:15 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so8721526fxm.42 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M8ekJ4Pv85tqXeALtBiAKX3IgZmjH+xqbQprk4VCBh8=; b=QTdpcXEOMN2QvNym6wD2VKDTdA7XCSLRAL7kUFdvgptP9qKKSaqD8HpaLCkqM9gVzj T4Cry2flL6pEdE4q1X/9XWFL2VE1pKbkNYNjU9nIzA+XxWjrjYVpmMpNc8pRTxOGDFFd r9Bki+eYdBkxVVHGwwyQpgnnHzZs5a1z3amf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qyxiAamoKg/R4AH4u/HbBMpc5qKvAkUozbHBTNRLh5CHpp18wRNEJ5E3KeSZRCLUOQ 4FE+nRhW3pOxoQ9oIDpaImMB/pc9YxQGQmCc7cUeYNcVnZrJUD/kbtOjjx/BbKr1C1LN KdZwPsS41NvQVflMMBM8ND2vZiC66Pg9Zzqw4= Original-Received: by 10.239.152.143 with SMTP id v15mr448793hbb.26.1243893373254; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:56:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2E369A57A535414C8193711D4740ACC5@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111266 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >> > I proposed making the variable always buffer-local. If you >> > don't want to do that, then yes, each mode for which nil >> > is appropriate would need to do that. >> >> I think this is a global feature. Making it buffer local by default is >> probably not the best then. > > Why? No reason given. Yes, I think so. In the next sentence. It is a behaviour that is expected to be the same in most buffers for at least most new users. It is on the same level as a key binding.