From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please make line-move-visual nil Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 23:26:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48914.130.55.118.19.1242592120.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <66C6BA04EBCF4B6DAED69E851627D852@us.oracle.com> <54A5E41E3FD446F590AA580D90C5B518@us.oracle.com> <56DF3F5FED9445EAB0C666DE0904BAC2@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243286800 9010 80.91.229.12 (25 May 2009 21:26:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 25 23:26:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M8hge-0004pS-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 23:26:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8hge-00032Y-9P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8hgZ-00032I-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8hgV-00031i-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50712 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8hgU-00031e-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:28530) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8hgU-0001Cs-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8hgT-0008VI-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 17:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3629581fxm.42 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:26:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eaGmKyDygVY0pcxtS8tE3GzHaeOZM/as65PMRZwXfjs=; b=j+ECadttqYdrIJ96t8ziTkxRKqg12O3NWKDi2JHB/+HQ9NXsVmceISEoUQVE4J8GYF IIxR2nfzXHcj6UCSFeLxasPD7QsLq8mwdc/f+Xq3LGIzl6jt99IGMf+c9MLjdQQlACif sH7hysEI8ANgdEFcE0qvqKmCp8JUYwPWKMqNg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UP3CMHY9oeKNRDwlQyyRR/4rk4ff4AmmwfwkzFOuAK3mA7xVscOaNMr0EeNQHkKF2+ yo6xM/tSQcD68kpgga/4HWvb0XLZc6lCXJGPQR1k6n06veBDxBId6afe6A/RBOWL7YTe HZK8JxRv5UOiqwl3VQem+b/3xFC8VMzQ92gLg= Original-Received: by 10.239.181.20 with SMTP id k20mr524454hbg.28.1243286771629; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:26:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111091 Archived-At: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I've seen mention that text-mode > should use a value of t, but haven't understood why that would be > a better choice there than elsewhere. I think it might be that word-wrap is also turned on by visual-line-mode. That may perhaps give the impression that the code was badly formatted, but in my opinion the fringe wrap symbols makes it clear what is happening. >>> 2 - there is very little evidence that someone might want different >>> behavior in different buffers. > >> Evidence: I'm someone who might want different behavior in different buffers. > > Which behavior where? Maybe I should not say this because I like the way visual-line-mode works, but could not the concept of majo mode parents be used to get some structure out of this?