From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please make line-move-visual nil Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:21:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <23521879.post@talk.nabble.com> <7b501d5c0905131659r1d79ec56s5a59f76e4713edf9@mail.gmail.com> <23532135.post@talk.nabble.com> <87tz3odq3l.fsf@iki.fi> <6fa54e4e0905140237g1a4483e6w179fb6d19b30550e@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242357681 9733 80.91.229.12 (15 May 2009 03:21:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Teemu Likonen , garyo , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Antoine Levitt Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 15 05:21:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M4nyz-00052C-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 May 2009 05:21:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39605 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M4nyy-0005US-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 23:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M4nyu-0005UH-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 23:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M4nyq-0005TK-CA for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 23:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44357 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M4nyq-0005TF-9E for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 23:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f161.google.com ([209.85.218.161]:38296) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4nyp-0006rc-R1 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 23:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1754559bwz.42 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 20:21:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=r7WbDaF+ijetA/p7zdtqCnCMTZKzDsXUBOJaELNX7HE=; b=cugj1a5U7dzY1QCmM/O1NzJj2HmAbLx3zspswC2SsrnTgxGmTgpPZRrDL5fRKILG09 l9UqA5r74lUrnhxDoieglcAbQ0z5Zymqi84+Z5eVEmcKz84qWAJxO8dYbHMjQOp1VA1N mY/rg8xGZDpHzAS59DWV4EYGzqsmd1jaFRmEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dppR1Y9z1OOWYWdU+IToqsonuHu4QEoAzAcGit2ltscAIyoY5OTkPVLw5+ZwTJMCHM zdFvhEGZhBdW1GSdyIYeXa7thaiE6ejOXAtNqhVC4tQd/yiamG/MJSORAItcklIyCP3U I1xMx2k1f27zus5rBgmzleHbH2OeKe5/z+0gM= Original-Received: by 10.223.113.200 with SMTP id b8mr2086820faq.84.1242357662750; Thu, 14 May 2009 20:21:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6fa54e4e0905140237g1a4483e6w179fb6d19b30550e@mail.gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110880 Archived-At: On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Antoine Levitt wrote: > I think line-move-visual is great for common usage. It seems to me the > problem of users with this new setting is mainly in keyboard macros. Why not > disable line-move-visual when typing or replaying a keyboard macro, since in > most case the user want the action to be independent of the line it is on ? > Kind of a hack, but there's clearly two usages of the line move commands > here. I have also suggested turning off line-move-visual when handling macros. I can't see any reason not to do that.