From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Small patch for rng-valid.el Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 00:59:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4A0ADA5D.4050308@gnu.org> <4A0B4F85.2080704@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242255591 25053 80.91.229.12 (13 May 2009 22:59:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 14 00:59:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M4NQK-0003nR-2v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 00:59:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55606 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M4NQJ-0000Ah-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:59:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M4NQE-0000AM-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M4NQ9-00009w-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57962 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M4NQ9-00009t-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f161.google.com ([209.85.218.161]:39316) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4NQ8-0000F1-4P; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1010217bwz.42 for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 15:59:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TtNVnHHqIit3d7nRlZpxLlGQnpdUy6slUMWQw8UtLwE=; b=TF4LVq5B8Rn8d3PqpZ2xWIODhae7Oz825q++6wCG4ivMp6GUKD0KbsTzLxDlXFvD9B AFAdtDRzg0s0Kemp/zKdZAF4n7wCGeVpACN5bp88SfHmyOSAkI5cVFPTl2vJiZz27QJD uaN/L4mYy5PrtKfStViXoJTMvmWJE3EOvo7FU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ccI5GE9HP1Pk8OCucrJ4S04drHgRk5JBdFitOaSzys/JEiZ/uAiwdkr1TsDnBpIn1L cLf2COjMJeXPIVz9bzKZKESWA+2y7jYpb1wo+yf1QycySIeJ1ezFQ4hP9b1F1d/oHFBt AWkyPGWKRwbmHo/Ca1qf/1QyTNpa25QHKdNY0= Original-Received: by 10.223.110.211 with SMTP id o19mr1330715fap.57.1242255566160; Wed, 13 May 2009 15:59:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A0B4F85.2080704@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110861 Archived-At: On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman wrote: >> >> However the check for a non-nil rng-validate-up-to-date-end in >> rng-after-change-function is very cheap so I see no good reason not to >> add it there now. >> > > The good reason is that Emacs is in a state of "regression bugfixes only" > code freeze. =C2=A0Checking in a change to workaround a bug in third part= y code > that the developer would prefer not to bother fixing right now is not an > option at this stage. Was not nXml added after the Emacs 22 release? As I said two of the fixes are just bug fixes. The third might not be a bug fix for Emacs, but I am not sure. Are you?