From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs kill problem Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241393202 26659 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2009 23:26:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Csaba Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 04 01:26:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M0l4q-00048e-Mf for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 01:26:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42975 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0l4q-0001oE-5c for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 19:26:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0l4V-0001n8-K6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 19:26:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0l4Q-0001hN-Hg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 19:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33052 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0l4Q-0001hC-C7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 19:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f161.google.com ([209.85.218.161]:43335) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0l4Q-0008Fp-0r for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 19:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3616553bwz.42 for ; Sun, 03 May 2009 16:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Odeza2Z/SNzMVJrQbSYC9hR/r63x+SNnnd/ANOq/7mM=; b=hojrKFztXJ3fnkLj/0X79beVRGHgFEqLbOMV8oeI5AZM6Ku3CfZujhrWTkeThchMXx DmDtrUlqC/ZcHtIt+A5SmD74ZgfqdJOnkHxjmRaOUZP/IUhWui9rwZu89P8EGwLbZDYy oWlFp85QudXRrW2thRqqVisg5/NR6jpLO3UUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uIMhlGRqj9YWfgDEUTLBdkfPBy9JPh2aZ4xlRpgF0Q1Ze3OKuAwiTwJGdV6T/MxbFR Uk+h6MLDk70HWVgd9jJgFqKSkLYX75kSaohq9pIgNlZVA005nxd6Ls690rUAJ1WA/GK0 t+w4m536X/pKYXWKgsCf/RjxuonFCTxEvVQVI= Original-Received: by 10.223.123.129 with SMTP id p1mr1699121far.29.1241393164100; Sun, 03 May 2009 16:26:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:64160 Archived-At: On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Csaba wrote: > This seems like a bug - but I imagine > that it's been dealt with since my version, > 21.3.1 from 2004-03-10 on Win XP Pro - > not sure how to search for it. > > If I have the following line: > Marko Petkov=C5=A1ek > then emacs is very unhappy if I try > to kill the line (ctrl+k) or wipe it out > (ctrl+w). Emacs will do it, but complain > (ring the bell) and it will not place the > removed entry into the yank buffer > (ie. doing ctrl+y will not recover it), > though I can undo the operation with > ctrl+x,u > > In my emacs, that =C5=A1 appears as \232 > (In other words I see "\232" (without > the quotes) and that is corresponds > to =C5=A1) > > Would someone please let me know > whether this has been fixed or if a but > report should be filed. I am sure it has been fixed. Please try the pretest for Emacs 23. Binaries are available here if you do not want to compile it yourself: http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/