From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "C-c C-c" binding for "submission" in server edit buffers Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:41:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87eivvxryg.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87iql79jmm.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87ws9mx4la.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239748925 18278 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2009 22:42:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 00:43:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LtrLf-0001Hx-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:43:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34293 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LtrKH-0004wv-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LtrKD-0004wg-Hp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LtrK8-0004wU-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41872 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LtrK8-0004wR-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f166.google.com ([209.85.220.166]:51226) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LtrK7-0006nn-Pe; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2931745fxm.42 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:41:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmCXkkUZNDW63T83AErvrY3AJ4PInc7hJSadPPEghhE=; b=ovLzvaw9sw+iwUbEUqfZt14bzP4Uz6fR8njb8i1xan8tKw/r89wT1mXcnDL9JkoNv8 9LZMhXNtE3w3Tc+oO/jOfJhsBbytzs8FscG+WPqDJojNxdBq2VT1SEqsuHxD8b43wd1X 8zxDX0173q5Lq/dAL04qkxNO3mXD85vLr9diA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=npoqeQcBHeSmPRdEdcmgKv8oOijKpHTVxYlv1IJCm9rxfodiW8oyBppB6iBOzQlrnm 46wZVgeaIXZKU76R8LcNQ19DS9guT3IEmcNSaC99KXzr7yBcTM0PLO+nolahAlS+/bQE NPTlPjXd1IGS8/tdhL+V+xw3LPYOn6Fsd6ICs= Original-Received: by 10.223.109.148 with SMTP id j20mr1385697fap.43.1239748906593; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:41:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ws9mx4la.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110286 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: >> What is the reason for not using >> =C2=A0 C-x k >> which normally kills the buffer? > > There are keybindings already (C-x #, C-x C-c for emacsclient -t); > mainly my point is that for certain circumstances, C-c C-c is far more > natural. > > So my desire is to make it simple to use C-c C-c in those circumstances. Thanks Miles, yes I understand what you want, but to me "C-x k" would be much more natural.