From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Printing Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:53:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5f0660120903280331y780c80b7i57a8115dc4b029eb@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238446429 31217 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2009 20:53:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, cmr.pent@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 22:55:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LoOVG-0006YF-Th for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:54:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOTt-0003M4-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOTo-0003J4-O4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOTk-000392-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44315 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOTk-00038o-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f167.google.com ([209.85.218.167]:48463) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoOTi-0004l2-BB; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so2005841bwz.42 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BiU/mgrd3+ueVxQUe69aq71toOTCzE11IB8tSlj6J98=; b=BqEXH6XCvjnna6rkSgnV8vI+HDdWVXWrDBn68xFw5bXpYlmS/WUZ5JlAY17qUy5zBa V9KA69JtWP42Y2jXDA/44QHrs9tXaD2ErAVraTVQozzXi6S370P2ExQrt4JEmujV4DZY dQepJ1rJnanvMddiiVyaNm31//vPInyLGSldk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BOQT4uDJcvG1ekM4ONNXxBY+Fc9EtAGjduhQHJA/UbA4ClH+XEGF/xaEmfpejWC5sy DryXq3VIPPqMoCgmD+kuRcfxQLJ5tfprxDVLVFswHN3pPJodP1B0MLQTPgkAa6TBNHE1 ajC3ojqJdM5VYWgd8XK14a5fpeH8sk3Qj3vdo= Original-Received: by 10.223.126.203 with SMTP id d11mr4417849fas.8.1238446384516; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:53:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109926 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:04:37 +0200 >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Cc: rms@gnu.org, cmr.pent@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:36:01 +0200 >> >> From: Lennart Borgman >> >> Cc: rms@gnu.org, cmr.pent@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > One way to fix this would be to update our default for >> >> > ps-mule-font-info-database so that it handles Unicode -- assuming t= hat >> >> > modern PostScript printers indeed support large subranges of the >> >> > Unicode codespace. =C2=A0I'm not an expert on printing, so I wouldn= 't know >> >> > if this is possible. >> >> >> >> Since printing with Emacs through the web browser (using >> >> htmlfontify.el) does work it seems like modern printers do support >> >> this. Or am I missing something? >> > >> > You are missing the fact that I was talking about PostScript printing, >> > not printing via the Windows printer API. >> >> I am not sure about that. Could someone who have this problem and have >> a PostScript printer try printing through the web browser, please? > > And that will prove what, exactly? that Windows knows how to use a PS > driver for a printer? I think that the browser will send PostScript to the printer. So I believe it will show that the printer actually can print all the text - but I am sure I might be missing something here.