From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> <18785.63907.370328.955342@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231158438 26323 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 12:27:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Nick Roberts" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 13:28:28 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJoZG-0000HM-K5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:28:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJoY1-0002Qa-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:27:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJoXc-0002G2-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:26:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJoXb-0002Ff-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:26:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39255 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJoXb-0002Fa-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:26:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:63523) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJoXa-0007Eb-Ew; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:26:42 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so2777750fgb.30 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:26:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2gyBwNPP8mdOL0vngXWEMGuh3vGO77lTgsOXONU1fK8=; b=daxikbawudvpnxLebbDRqesUr7/4i97zHADacl5ehBee4qkeXaYt/bjS69x1ed34yX V1M9ThTktGWQBKCyIVjT+sbrrXONJt7q4lnP2lIGm+RH1pzwHwoZwtrDXvl/3pLjyhjo xwQX8MtKSPKo9R3tSb9OERs12UV7auWJSV/Sc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BmbXf06spTGqC7/NGPC3OIH8Vu3rNaZwW/oEyhlBROD4ePnE+3a+1bnX7Cn27ekS7S 4Ty+NcaMQO100rym6KbD+nG95xjQ+3J/83NO/RW3ljcvrRUwj6TZokI92e2TT+pWWGXn LbHCOnjv9Ys8785A2r2o1R/Ec/DHnrjFTN5Mw= Original-Received: by 10.86.84.18 with SMTP id h18mr12166348fgb.69.1231158400607; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:26:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.86.35.9 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:26:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <18785.63907.370328.955342@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107608 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > I will start posting the details and hope it helps in deciding using > > more scientific approach. > > Please don't. RMS has stated on several occasions that the choice of VCS for > Emacs development has been decided in favour of bzr i.e it's not up for > discussion. I think it is still interesting to know the performance for bzr on w32 for a project like Emacs.