From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:48:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231148906 27654 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 09:48:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 10:49:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJm5Y-0004Bl-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:49:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40936 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJm4J-0003F4-Lp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJm4F-0003Ey-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJm4E-0003Em-NO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49574 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJm4E-0003Ej-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:39272) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJm49-0003Ml-VK; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:48:10 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so2755557fgb.30 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:48:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=yFaFpbZNrWAvj+9bUQSHo5OBwJwLP6QfCVs2d0ycRco=; b=ODVEEsq+JumnsRPSBukv4aDJKOJS5XGSaeSWzn3ba52uhsyV81bEN324iyVrD44x/J 5urKPMf74cuVWlAb3By27p0dFHutcCsX/yvWZU62USXbsGfsUb4HKkmhaysV3XU1gt91 8o/e6VLHP4KP6zpNtT4z2dw9HpFMgbbzvfXHA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=PWfErP+5u0nCaky7CAjGRQynyzW9h4hYMphAr6MHuoUxvodFUfTY4BELgy5WCzE2av dRiEzo6jPpmMVz18Kd6dz4hwPMu0KnXVJwQ/iBS3rPva7ZYPOAssjEhNq8FXaQmr1zo+ s2RtA4HayiLOR6WnX83WzphuLsHA+FkYuj0jA= Original-Received: by 10.86.59.2 with SMTP id h2mr7648518fga.73.1231148887962; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:48:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.86.35.9 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:48:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107601 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Is "bzr pull" the equivalent of "cvs up -d"? That is, is that the > > command to resync with the master repository? Because if it is, it is > > slower than CVS by a large margin (but so is git's 3 min, so I assume > > "bzr pull" is not the equivalent of "cvs up -d"). > > Are you testing on Windows? git has historically had performance > problems on Windows because its Unix-oriented optimizations are often > pessimizations on Windows. Does this mean bzr is unusable for w32 users (for a large project like Emacs)?