From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:54:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20081022091136.GB924@muc.de> <20081022151444.GE924@muc.de> <48FF58FB.6000302@harpegolden.net> <20081022211202.GA1037@muc.de> <49001F5A.7040402@harpegolden.net> <20081023090908.GB2666@muc.de> <4900ACF9.7060501@harpegolden.net> <4900FF17.2000203@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224806060 11134 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2008 23:54:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David De La Harpe Golden" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 01:55:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtA1Q-0008TE-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:55:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtA0K-0002Ga-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtA0H-0002GJ-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtA0G-0002Fm-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47892 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtA0G-0002Fg-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:19846) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KtA0F-0005GN-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so762021fgb.30 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Zvg+wsX9UQa+n0VhI6k4bNGT4ZH2ZzJjUoexKxRWPiA=; b=eRLwRlQpIx3kQS8H9Ng/YXiKVDK9E9z163G9rJQPIb3REDIQp2EySdStJyKrC6EEXK H/tbhyNEL2WZHi70nr/n024380YrCezwflcmutU7IFSQg2sB4b5PbkYIcVeWeA+FUVg2 vPNzA5D+btYkDV3/jgw7MdqR2513zR/r9vU7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JFBCEjhPFQcWK2SwtF3nDmMf1XBSnB7ou73gNNP66Lcmw0RcZszaIYN7XsBgRfj4f9 lFYvBDjI/NUqVo2cX+BxLnB3fXmLL1T/6HQfJcrHOvrSS1ZuRkg+DWoXixS5JCb/EA6S fGkLJMHpVRAkJICtxrjS+bHjtsBy7cBmRa++M= Original-Received: by 10.181.156.12 with SMTP id i12mr437647bko.102.1224806046144; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.86.65.3 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104917 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > In `after-find-file' (which is > called at the end of `find-file-noselect-1') there are some calls to > `file-attributes'. Are they perhaps involved? There is also a call to `file-modes'. I did some further tests: Timing insert-file-contents-literally: Elapsed time: 8.375000s (0.187000s in 1 GCs) Timing insert-file-contents: Elapsed time: 14.297000s (0.312000s in 2 GCs) Timing file-attributes: Elapsed time: 5.890000s (0.156000s in 1 GCs) Timing file-exists-p: Elapsed time: 6.672000s (0.125000s in 1 GCs) Timing file-modes: Elapsed time: 5.609000s (0.188000s in 1 GCs)