From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: master 583cb26 2/3: Improve accuracy in string-replace description (bug#43598) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20200927124520.25321.62354@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200927124522.BA20F207E0@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <9B45E488-F245-4A94-A492-C60B617A734B@acm.org> <50bea60b-b70b-4a80-b85b-0c9283a033de@default> <83o8lplu2v.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0wdlqj8.fsf@gnu.org> <83eemll37t.fsf@gnu.org> <4d6ae7e4-d23b-4e1a-9ad1-c27f402a64cb@default> <5A5A4570-876A-4EEB-BEBA-F5EA38CEBBB6@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1135"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, rpluim@gmail.com, john@yates-sheets.org To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 29 17:30:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNHZw-00007q-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:30:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36622 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNHZv-0000hF-91 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNHYS-0007Xb-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:39902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNHYQ-0001Qm-N4; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08TFF5ce141480; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:28:31 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=lFqphyFH4unQgvfzmZlzW2bWRvfgTomGu0bjdxvSIdE=; b=Ih/u/ba4f6uUoYxKkv4aZSB6XkKe31QarMxQA/fsuVADT+GBrNb5RtwtlGfy0lms+L8N OnFCiuYX8764+Cd8dSCMVAvg5KgSOJf9hTIB9GBmWcSw97gIRmKb6OE8mpopngY2cWlr pA7e2p4CTAAl0BOotXlrA5+DB+cGKq2IUvx7Ya157lIsGiR/VzIzSyPT/wK02w0XMC7w sGVY0cC3zz6WE3+Cw1F/tqi7eLJ0IwFsS77ifGskA3cxw6uYLVoUEAJ/4UEsRvhZ9s9D akl8AGC0LJHgvTeoXazfWK+0Selbi10u9kZEgFBUrnrIUgjGetJ+fupyRyue1JLCFVKt fQ== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33sx9n3hy2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:28:31 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08TF9j6v189391; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:28:30 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33tfjwwqp1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:28:30 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08TFST8I029531; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:28:29 GMT In-Reply-To: <5A5A4570-876A-4EEB-BEBA-F5EA38CEBBB6@gnu.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5056.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9759 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009290134 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9759 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009290134 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/29 11:28:33 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -56 X-Spam_score: -5.7 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.687, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.614, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256710 Archived-At: > > > So they are not equal, right? > > > > Right. I don't think anyone said they were. >=20 > You suggested to use "equal" in the doc string > for strings which we now agree are not equal. > Such doc string would confusing. We're going 'round and 'round. As I said before, I am not the one who suggested to use "equal": I'm not the one who proposed that "equal" part And the suggestions were _never_ to say that the input and result strings are equal. It was to say that the input string _with the changes applied_ is equal (in fact `equal') to the returned string. Which is true. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-09/msg02159.html I suggest you maybe reread what the suggestions were. This incessant back & forth quibbling is tiring. I'm done with this one.