From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #6210 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:59:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83pr0s9zbe.fsf@gnu.org> <87aarw41w3.fsf@telefonica.net> <83mxvvrjnq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274284800 13879 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2010 16:00:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 16:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 17:59:59 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OElgb-0005JY-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 17:59:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53331 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OElgb-0002Eo-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:59:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60497 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OElgB-00026W-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OElgA-0003yg-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55932) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OElg9-0003yc-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OElg8-0008TU-HK; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:59:28 -0400 X-Spook: anthrax White Water Khaddafi Leitrim Jiang Zemin X-Ran: F(^gJ'Q]xo`e?G1qXHP')$xgiY>FDxw,dhd1{Htig*aa=ZGenf1G<>5u'RHI&\ey6k> X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83mxvvrjnq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed\, 19 May 2010 18\:33\:13 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124942 Archived-At: >> It is not in the moderator's queue, so probably it was discarded by >> mistake. The bug-gnu-emacs moderation is separate from the debbugs-submit moderation. Probably the former is not needed at all now (except maybe for the news gateway?); but belt-and-braces, hey? > It just showed up, so it wasn't discarded. But I have no idea why it > took it so long to appear. In my experience, it often takes ~ a day for listhelper-moderate to approve bug-gnu-emacs messages. They do have a lot of lists to check. So you will often see things on debbugs.gnu.org up to 24 hrs before they hit the mailing list.