From: Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: coding tags and utf-16
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:32:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dse2i6$d2b$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85vewxodk2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
David Kastrup wrote:
> Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org> writes:
>
>>In article <m1psn61xim.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>>>> So, in any cases, a tag value itself is useless. Then how
>>>> to detect utf-16 more reliably? In the current Emacs
>>>> (i.e. Ver.22), I think we can use auto-coding-regexp-alist
>>>> or auto-coding-alist. In the former case, we can register
>>>> BOM patterns and also something like "\\`\\(\0[\0-\177]\\)+"
>>>> for utf-16be. In the latter case, you can use more
>>>> complicated heuristics in a registered function.
>>
>>>Can't it be somehow added to detect_coding_utf_16?
>>
>>Yes, but usually it has no effect if, for instance,
>>iso-8859-1 is more preferred. If only ASCII and Latin-1
>>characters are encoded in utf-16, all bytes (including BOM)
>>are valid for iso-8859-1.
>
> I thought we had discussed this already. The BOM-encodings should
> have priority since the likelihood of a misdetection is negligible
> (the character pair does not make sense at the start of a text in
> latin-1 in any language): the only thing that can reasonably be
> expected to happen is that a binary file is detected as utf-16. Not
> much of an issue, I'd say.
Exactly. So why haven't these entries been added to
auto-coding-regexp-alist?
("\\`\xEF\xBB\xBF" . utf-8)
("\\`\xFE\xFF" . utf-16-be)
("\\`\xFF\xFE" . utf-16-le)
("\\`\x00\x00\xFE\xFF" . utf-32-be)
("\\`\xFF\xFE\x00\x00" . utf-32-le)
> Of course, for the BOM-less utf-16 encodings, priority should depend
> on the language environment.
Definitely.
--
Kevin Rodgers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-21 8:00 coding tags and utf-16 Werner LEMBERG
2005-12-23 23:43 ` Werner LEMBERG
2005-12-24 16:32 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-04 6:42 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-01-04 14:58 ` Werner LEMBERG
2006-01-05 3:46 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-05 4:33 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-01-05 12:24 ` David Kastrup
2006-01-06 0:27 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-01-05 23:11 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-06 1:22 ` Werner LEMBERG
2006-01-06 11:26 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-01-07 4:23 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-07 6:05 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-01-05 15:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-06 6:31 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-01-06 10:28 ` David Kastrup
2006-02-09 0:32 ` Kevin Rodgers [this message]
2006-02-28 1:08 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-03-04 20:34 ` Benjamin Riefenstahl
2006-03-06 13:04 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-03-06 19:35 ` Benjamin Riefenstahl
2006-03-07 1:02 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-03-08 5:42 ` Tomas Zerolo
2006-03-16 2:23 ` Kenichi Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='dse2i6$d2b$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=ihs_4664@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.