From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:03:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zkkzfiz5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762nnujk8.fsf@gmx.de> <87r56953jk.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309629844 11939 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2011 18:04:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 20:04:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4Xw-0004NR-B5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:04:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4Xv-0003E3-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4Xc-0003DU-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4Xb-0006H0-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4Xb-0006Gu-8U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59679) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4Xa-000209-Ie; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:03:38 -0400 X-Spook: FTS2000 FSF Area 51 eavesdropping enforcers president X-Ran: y46Y[vTSa_,kIcc?`YIO0]I5Wq+=#rgDeA156&%i.?:l\#rmDh~ups5Q9\Lo+N:WL5?`'& X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87r56953jk.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:23:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141455 Archived-At: Michael Albinus wrote: > What does cause the load? debbugs-get-bugs or debbugs-get-status? I > suspect the latter one, which could carry an arbitrary number of > bugnumbers. I think you are right; at least the former doesn't have much of an effect on the load. > debbugs-get-status, the frontend could ask (like in gnus): > > How many articles from gmane.emacs.devel (available 140599, default 200): OK, except there should be a hard-coded upper limit on the number you can fetch at any one time (really this should be implemented on the server I guess, argh, but it would be great if the client could implement it). Say 500?