From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13965: info.info conflict between emacs and texinfo Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:24:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <201304022125.r32LPEU4015513@freefriends.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364948706 20305 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 00:25:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 00:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13965@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-texinfo@gnu.org To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 02:25:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBW7-0006Qw-7v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 02:25:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52592 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBVi-0008CS-Ez for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBVe-0008B5-Up for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBVd-0007Tg-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBVd-0007RN-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBYY-0002d0-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13965 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13965-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13965.136494885010061 (code B ref 13965); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13965) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2013 00:27:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBY2-0002cD-5Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBY0-0002c5-Ck for 13965@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNBV4-0005Q6-S8; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:24:26 -0400 X-Spook: BRLO Vince Foster Centro Attorney General mindwar NORAD X-Ran: -@<@si"kecfbA'H~+3t'w0g[*Q:B+l*),[lhR_ti[mOPX.*uQ54%u"~i'Ph1?$U\KEnE.P X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <201304022125.r32LPEU4015513@freefriends.org> (Karl Berry's message of "Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:25:14 GMT") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73100 Archived-At: Karl Berry wrote: > The point is that nearly every other package in GNU uses fdl.texi (as > far as I have seen). Why should Emacs use a different name for the > file? No reason other than history/inertia AFAIK. It's always been "doclicense.texi", for ~ 13 years now.