From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scratch buffer annoyance Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:32:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87odhqethv.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87zm18v7ug.fsf@jurta.org> <85abt7kck1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87hcndc3zc.fsf@jurta.org> <87643pbqjq.fsf@jurta.org> <85643ppor9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87sl6sbjaw.fsf@jurta.org> <87fy2oms2y.fsf@jurta.org> <85sl6o3rj1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <873aykml2v.fsf@jurta.org> <87bqd744yp.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187393313 8202 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2007 23:28:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 18 01:28:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IMBEx-0007Bc-RC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:28:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMBEx-0004ds-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMBEu-0004cz-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMBEt-0004cL-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMBEt-0004cI-E0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IMBEt-0000Ms-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IMBIY-0004YU-L1; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:32:10 -0400 X-Spook: Agfa counter terrorism event security Blowpipe Dateline X-Ran: l(g^nVb|/HGtXigJCg-j-#x2QHrX=,\X(,g08b3:O]~mYAO6:k8u.`M&\?yw(i3/BNu*}E X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:50:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76712 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > No way! Hardly anyone will see the second screen > if you have to explicitly ask for it. > > I would be glad to find a better way, but I don't want to change > to something worse. Get rid of the image. Or, display the image once only for ~ two seconds on its own, then switch to a static splash screen with just text. It would still be fancy in terms of fonts and colours.