From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Longlines and insert Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:22:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <874q6fa1t0.wl%david.wallin@ul.ie> <87hdaebqxb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200511152241.20666.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <873blxjysz.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <8764qt9u85.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132256028 15578 80.91.229.2 (17 Nov 2005 19:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 20:33:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcpSW-0006ME-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcpSV-0004d3-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EcpSG-0004bk-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:29:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EcpSF-0004aI-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:29:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcpSF-0004aF-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:29:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EcpSE-0000rL-SS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:29:55 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EcpPG-0004qp-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:26:50 +0100 Original-Received: from 207.167.42.60 ([207.167.42.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:26:50 +0100 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 207.167.42.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:26:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.167.42.60 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46170 Archived-At: Richard M. Stallman wrote: > If the hard-newline variable is enough to do the job, > I would rather stick to that idea. It is simpler and less risky. Wouldn't the easiest thing be to add a call to (set-hard-newline-properties (point-min) (point)) after mail-header-separator and its trailing newline have been inserted? -- Kevin Rodgers