From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christian Schlauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'? Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:37:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fyr77paq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200510112320.j9BNKDn09363@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: cs-usenet@arcor.de NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131039831 12575 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2005 17:43:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 18:43:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXj5z-0007fe-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:41:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXj5x-0003Q6-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:41:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXj5j-0003NP-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXj5g-0003LC-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:41:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXj5g-0003L8-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:41:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EXj5g-0006MN-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:41:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EXj3U-0006kw-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:39:16 +0100 Original-Received: from chrsc2.ikp.liu.se ([130.236.36.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:39:16 +0100 Original-Received: from cs-usenet by chrsc2.ikp.liu.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:39:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: chrsc2.ikp.liu.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45364 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > When I try SPC now, it does move the mouse pointer to the Ediff >frame, but only if the mouse is not on another Emacs frame (or on a >window that belongs to another Windows program). I didn't investigate this -- when I use ediff, the mouse is always on an Emacs frame: either the Ediff frame, or the main Emacs frame. >So I'm left wondering why would you have the mouse outside any frame >at this point? I don't know -- did I give the impression that I have the mouse outside any frame? >If I understood you correctly, we are discussing a situation when a >user moves the mouse across the differences (displayed in an Emacs >frame in two adjacent windows) while she reads the differences. Exactly. I do `M-x ediff-buffers RET RET RET' -> the Ediff-frame pops up and gets the `focus', I navigate with SPC and Backspace from difference region to difference region, and in large difference regions, I `tick off' the fine differences in the newer buffer by moving the mouse from fine difference to fine difference *in the current difference region*. > I understood your arguments the first time, I assumed that ;-) > they just don't convince me. Okay. -- Christian Schlauer